Tools & Wizards About Us
allnet-flat-vergleich.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

allnet-flat-vergleich.de

Günstige Allnet Flat Tarife im Vergleich: Handyvertrag ab 4,99 €

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

426 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

733 ms

allnet-flat-vergleich.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to allnet-flat-vergleich.de homepage info - get ready to check Allnet Flat Vergleich best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about allnet-flat-vergleich.de

Vergleich für Allnet Flat Tarife & Handy Aktionen ab 4,99 €. ➥ Jetzt die günstigsten Verträge im Februar & Prepaid Angebote ohne Laufzeit vergleichen.

Visit allnet-flat-vergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Allnet-flat-vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 426 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

allnet-flat-vergleich.de performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

allnet-flat-vergleich.de

426 ms

allnet-flat-vergleich.de

452 ms

1289 ms

ccr.css

337 ms

dashicons.min.css

453 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Allnet-flat-vergleich.de, 95% (69 requests) were made to Yeahmobile.de and 1% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Yeahmobile.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 641.0 kB (61%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

402.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Allnet-flat-vergleich.de main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 685.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 633.7 kB

  • Original 685.3 kB
  • After minification 685.3 kB
  • After compression 51.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 633.7 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 116.5 kB
  • After minification 112.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Allnet Flat Vergleich images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 121.0 kB
  • After minification 121.0 kB
  • After compression 119.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 121.0 kB
  • After minification 121.0 kB
  • After compression 119.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Allnet-flat-vergleich.de has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (50%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

33

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Allnet Flat Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

allnet-flat-vergleich.de

allnet-flat-vergleich.de

426 ms

allnet-flat-vergleich.de

allnet-flat-vergleich.de

452 ms

1289 ms

ccr.css

ccr.css

337 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

453 ms

base.min.css

base.min.css

341 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

457 ms

widgets.min.css

widgets.min.css

346 ms

helpers.min.css

helpers.min.css

350 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

446 ms

skin.css

skin.css

453 ms

shortcodes.min.css

shortcodes.min.css

468 ms

single.min.css

single.min.css

470 ms

taqyeem.min.css

taqyeem.min.css

557 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

570 ms

cc.css

cc.css

561 ms

cc.js

cc.js

562 ms

screen.min.css

screen.min.css

424 ms

ccr.js

ccr.js

425 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

486 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

590 ms

sliders.min.js

sliders.min.js

486 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

488 ms

desktop.min.js

desktop.min.js

488 ms

live-search.js

live-search.js

489 ms

single.min.js

single.min.js

589 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

589 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

590 ms

yeahmobile-logo.svg

yeahmobile-logo.svg

218 ms

telekom-netz.png

telekom-netz.png

219 ms

vodafone-netz.png

vodafone-netz.png

319 ms

telefonica-netz.png

telefonica-netz.png

320 ms

1und1-netz.png

1und1-netz.png

319 ms

smartmobil.png

smartmobil.png

320 ms

congstar.png

congstar.png

411 ms

sim-de.png

sim-de.png

412 ms

otelo.jpg

otelo.jpg

412 ms

gmx.jpg

gmx.jpg

418 ms

web-de.png

web-de.png

418 ms

blau.png

blau.png

420 ms

o2-netz.png

o2-netz.png

486 ms

talkline.png

talkline.png

487 ms

blacksim.png

blacksim.png

564 ms

premiumsim.png

premiumsim.png

565 ms

vodafone.gif

vodafone.gif

564 ms

simon-mobile.png

simon-mobile.png

565 ms

aldi-talk.png

aldi-talk.png

565 ms

lidl-connect.jpg

lidl-connect.jpg

565 ms

high-mobile.png

high-mobile.png

683 ms

tchibo.png

tchibo.png

684 ms

freenetmobile.gif

freenetmobile.gif

685 ms

winsim.png

winsim.png

686 ms

telekom.png

telekom.png

645 ms

klarmobil.png

klarmobil.png

644 ms

o2.png

o2.png

692 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

774 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

639 ms

tielabs-fonticon.ttf

tielabs-fonticon.ttf

686 ms

edeka-smart.png

edeka-smart.png

686 ms

fonic.png

fonic.png

677 ms

freenet.gif

freenet.gif

669 ms

megasim.png

megasim.png

670 ms

1und1.jpg

1und1.jpg

670 ms

lohnt-sich-eine-allnet-flat.jpg

lohnt-sich-eine-allnet-flat.jpg

737 ms

welches-netz-ist-das-beste.jpg

welches-netz-ist-das-beste.jpg

799 ms

alles-inklusive.jpg

alles-inklusive.jpg

696 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

48 ms

drillisch-online-partner.png

drillisch-online-partner.png

651 ms

body-bg10.png

body-bg10.png

655 ms

plus1.png

plus1.png

655 ms

neutral4.png

neutral4.png

607 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

758 ms

print.css

print.css

118 ms

Accessibility Review

allnet-flat-vergleich.de accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

allnet-flat-vergleich.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

allnet-flat-vergleich.de SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Allnet-flat-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Allnet-flat-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

allnet-flat-vergleich.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Allnet Flat Vergleich. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: