Tools & Wizards About Us
alrmal.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

alrmal.de

Google

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

437 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

501 ms

alrmal.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to alrmal.de homepage info - get ready to check Alrmal best content right away, or after learning these important things about alrmal.de

Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for.

Visit alrmal.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Alrmal.de page load time and found that the first response time was 437 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

alrmal.de performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,420 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.219

57/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

alrmal.de

437 ms

86e5af4da5.css

123 ms

b9295a4096.js

296 ms

all.js

432 ms

4b82b9ba82.js

294 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Alrmal.de, 20% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 13% (6 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (677 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 277.3 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

917.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Alrmal.de main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 878.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 34.3 kB

  • Original 43.5 kB
  • After minification 43.5 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 36.6 kB

  • Original 878.1 kB
  • After minification 841.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Alrmal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 146.4 kB

  • Original 205.0 kB
  • After minification 205.0 kB
  • After compression 58.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 146.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 60.1 kB

  • Original 68.1 kB
  • After minification 68.1 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Alrmal.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (49%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Alrmal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

alrmal.de

alrmal.de

437 ms

86e5af4da5.css

86e5af4da5.css

123 ms

b9295a4096.js

b9295a4096.js

296 ms

all.js

all.js

432 ms

4b82b9ba82.js

4b82b9ba82.js

294 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

134 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

111 ms

in.js

in.js

112 ms

a47c72f998.css

a47c72f998.css

305 ms

5dda51305c.js

5dda51305c.js

295 ms

969a1eed9d.js

969a1eed9d.js

659 ms

85452db942.js

85452db942.js

226 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

154 ms

secureAnonymousFramework

secureAnonymousFramework

113 ms

e8cecb8c04-Screenshot_2015-10-22_00393900.png

e8cecb8c04-Screenshot_2015-10-22_00393900.png

645 ms

2b0743f590-14670_10205482905204595_846302983177605345_n.jpg

2b0743f590-14670_10205482905204595_846302983177605345_n.jpg

213 ms

5e38ae5440-Screenshot_2016-01-13_202533.png

5e38ae5440-Screenshot_2016-01-13_202533.png

365 ms

180 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

301 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

677 ms

share

share

197 ms

sprite_connect_v14.png

sprite_connect_v14.png

183 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

139 ms

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

80 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

29 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_2

cb=gapi.loaded_2

60 ms

sharebutton

sharebutton

206 ms

0ef124d7ef.png

0ef124d7ef.png

205 ms

0d043601d6.png

0d043601d6.png

203 ms

c933167de7-alrmal2.jpg

c933167de7-alrmal2.jpg

593 ms

dc7860d133-facelift.jpg

dc7860d133-facelift.jpg

229 ms

5e0a217559-header_0_0.png

5e0a217559-header_0_0.png

541 ms

follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html

follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html

64 ms

tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.de.html

tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.de.html

90 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

227 ms

rs=AGLTcCOJ4AMNA1EZSgGPzZnainRbXAPPWA

rs=AGLTcCOJ4AMNA1EZSgGPzZnainRbXAPPWA

35 ms

rs=AGLTcCONxGUsPy056g5GZ4SXNwZLHSyisw

rs=AGLTcCONxGUsPy056g5GZ4SXNwZLHSyisw

34 ms

share_button.php

share_button.php

132 ms

xypMPkk3qWn0aVtKdo69mQLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff

xypMPkk3qWn0aVtKdo69mQLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff

198 ms

xZQOmYg4x3YaWkTJi1kErvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff

xZQOmYg4x3YaWkTJi1kErvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff

198 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

176 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

108 ms

qeKvIRsJabD.js

qeKvIRsJabD.js

539 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

641 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

4 ms

jot.html

jot.html

2 ms

Accessibility Review

alrmal.de accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

alrmal.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

alrmal.de SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Alrmal.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Alrmal.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

alrmal.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Alrmal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: