Tools & Wizards About Us
amadorhealth.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

amadorhealth.org

Amador Health Center – Community care should never be conditional

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

136 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

590 ms

amadorhealth.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Amador Health content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about amadorhealth.org

Visit amadorhealth.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Amadorhealth.org page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

amadorhealth.org performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.262

47/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

amadorhealth.org

136 ms

amadorhealth.org

303 ms

style.min.css

302 ms

style-coblocks-1.css

243 ms

style-coblocks-extensions.css

252 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Amadorhealth.org, 80% (24 requests) were made to 2moa22.p3cdn1.secureserver.net and 7% (2 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (412 ms) relates to the external source 2moa22.p3cdn1.secureserver.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 112.9 kB (18%)

Content Size

621.5 kB

After Optimization

508.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Amadorhealth.org main page is 621.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 231.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 97.2 kB

  • Original 116.7 kB
  • After minification 115.6 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 231.2 kB
  • After minification 231.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Amador Health images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 180.3 kB
  • After minification 180.3 kB
  • After compression 165.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 93.4 kB
  • After minification 93.4 kB
  • After compression 92.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amadorhealth.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (89%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amador Health. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

amadorhealth.org

amadorhealth.org

136 ms

amadorhealth.org

amadorhealth.org

303 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

302 ms

style-coblocks-1.css

style-coblocks-1.css

243 ms

style-coblocks-extensions.css

style-coblocks-extensions.css

252 ms

style-coblocks-animation.css

style-coblocks-animation.css

163 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

266 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

163 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

177 ms

latest.css

latest.css

182 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

196 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

191 ms

css

css

33 ms

dflip.min.css

dflip.min.css

231 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

234 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

235 ms

beacon.min.js

beacon.min.js

68 ms

coblocks-animation.js

coblocks-animation.js

235 ms

tiny-swiper.js

tiny-swiper.js

244 ms

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

246 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

412 ms

navigation.min.js

navigation.min.js

248 ms

scroll-to-top.js

scroll-to-top.js

409 ms

dflip.min.js

dflip.min.js

259 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

268 ms

dwf.js

dwf.js

410 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

5 ms

tti.min.js

tti.min.js

4 ms

cropped-amador1-edited.jpg

cropped-amador1-edited.jpg

111 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

124 ms

Accessibility Review

amadorhealth.org accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

amadorhealth.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

amadorhealth.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amadorhealth.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Amadorhealth.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

amadorhealth.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Amador Health. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: