Tools & Wizards About Us
amal.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

amal.net

Amal Graafstra - Technologist, Author & Double RFID Implantee

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

5.5 sec

Page Rendered

265 ms

amal.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to amal.net homepage info - get ready to check Amal best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about amal.net

I\'m just a guy who loves coming up with ideas and trying to make those ideas come true. I\'m constantly amazed the power of a good idea has over people, the

Visit amal.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Amal.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Amal.net rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

amal.net performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.064

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

amal.net

1499 ms

style.css

245 ms

styles.css

167 ms

fancybox.css

187 ms

twitter-feed.css

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Amal.net, 5% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Amal.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 227.9 kB (47%)

Content Size

484.8 kB

After Optimization

256.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Amal.net main page is 484.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 193.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 37.6 kB

  • Original 48.0 kB
  • After minification 44.8 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 149.6 kB
  • After minification 144.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Amal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 107.5 kB

  • Original 193.0 kB
  • After minification 189.8 kB
  • After compression 85.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 107.5 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 77.5 kB

  • Original 94.1 kB
  • After minification 81.9 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amal.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (48%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

amal.net

amal.net

1499 ms

style.css

style.css

245 ms

styles.css

styles.css

167 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

187 ms

twitter-feed.css

twitter-feed.css

187 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

280 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

21 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

473 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

328 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

297 ms

external-tracking.min.js

external-tracking.min.js

298 ms

dirtycode.css

dirtycode.css

325 ms

dirtycode.js

dirtycode.js

371 ms

jquery-1.3.js.php

jquery-1.3.js.php

673 ms

microAudio.js.php

microAudio.js.php

405 ms

dropdown.css

dropdown.css

407 ms

dropdown.js

dropdown.js

408 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

382 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

418 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

3 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

57 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

407 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

58 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

17 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

245 ms

ga.js

ga.js

68 ms

get_flash_player.gif

get_flash_player.gif

55 ms

topbgi.gif

topbgi.gif

102 ms

facebook_sm.png

facebook_sm.png

97 ms

twitter_sm.png

twitter_sm.png

99 ms

rss_sm.png

rss_sm.png

100 ms

go.png

go.png

102 ms

amalintro.jpg

amalintro.jpg

409 ms

amalgraafstra.png

amalgraafstra.png

166 ms

ctbg.gif

ctbg.gif

187 ms

logo_triangle_100.png

logo_triangle_100.png

186 ms

delicious.png

delicious.png

187 ms

digg.png

digg.png

188 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

243 ms

reddit.png

reddit.png

280 ms

stumbleupon.png

stumbleupon.png

281 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

281 ms

antibiotics-150x100.jpg

antibiotics-150x100.jpg

284 ms

hazard-poison-radioactive-150x112.jpg

hazard-poison-radioactive-150x112.jpg

409 ms

slide_xntfund-150x75.png

slide_xntfund-150x75.png

551 ms

GN-900-150x150.jpg

GN-900-150x150.jpg

811 ms

2013-10-17_19-32-43-150x101.png

2013-10-17_19-32-43-150x101.png

983 ms

ting-150x84.jpg

ting-150x84.jpg

3373 ms

2013-05-27_20-59-08-150x185.jpg

2013-05-27_20-59-08-150x185.jpg

494 ms

20130517_124505-150x112.jpg

20130517_124505-150x112.jpg

498 ms

poetry-150x199.jpg

poetry-150x199.jpg

579 ms

kd.png

kd.png

580 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

27 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

31 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

28 ms

services.css

services.css

55 ms

g.gif

g.gif

4 ms

Accessibility Review

amal.net accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

amal.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

amal.net SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amal.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Amal.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

amal.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Amal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: