11.4 sec in total
1.3 sec
9.4 sec
579 ms
Click here to check amazing Amana content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about amana.jp
コミュニケーション変革をクリエイティブで実現するアマナは、企業や社会の本質的な価値や課題を見出して、伝わる形にビジュアライズ:具現化することで「届けたい想いが伝わり、行動を促す」コミュニケーションを創ることを目指しています。
Visit amana.jpWe analyzed Amana.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
amana.jp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value36.7 s
0/100
25%
Value27.1 s
0/100
10%
Value1,930 ms
8/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value27.1 s
0/100
10%
1337 ms
770 ms
315 ms
492 ms
830 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Amana.jp, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Amana.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 608.0 kB (22%)
2.8 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Amana.jp main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.5 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 174.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Amana images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 271.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 271.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amana.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 104.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (40%)
98
59
The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amana. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
amana.jp
1337 ms
common.css
770 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
315 ms
layout.css
492 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
830 ms
plugin.js
664 ms
common.js
978 ms
b7a5f0ac-7948-46c4-8ea8-5dd2ff23b2f6.js
63 ms
config.js
675 ms
inquiry_keyword.js
856 ms
keyvisual.js
985 ms
mti_otf.js
149 ms
3337 ms
3448 ms
loading.gif
180 ms
logo_hd_amana.png
325 ms
ico_hd_contact.png
329 ms
ico_hd_search.png
331 ms
ico_hd_news.png
338 ms
ico_hd_stockphoto.png
352 ms
ico_service_rss.png
507 ms
ico_service_new.png
629 ms
works_thum_128.jpg
1003 ms
works_thum_125.jpg
1167 ms
works_thum_127.png
1648 ms
works_thum_124.jpg
1044 ms
news_thum_20160226.jpg
820 ms
news_thum_20160212.jpg
956 ms
news_thum_20160209.jpg
1148 ms
news_thum_20160205.jpg
1421 ms
img_kv_dummy.gif
1324 ms
topKV_img_images.jpg
2194 ms
topKV_img_infoto.jpg
1997 ms
topKV_img_screen.jpg
2397 ms
topKV_img_shelf2.jpg
3073 ms
topKV_img_mca3.jpg
2253 ms
top_KV_textbnr_images.png
1980 ms
topKV_thum_images.jpg
2317 ms
top_KV_textbnr_infoto.png
2328 ms
topKV_thum_infoto.jpg
2522 ms
top_KV_textbnr_screen.png
2589 ms
topKV_thum_screen.jpg
2662 ms
top_KV_textbnr_shelf.png
2661 ms
topKV_thum_shelf.jpg
2755 ms
top_KV_textbnr_mca.png
2849 ms
topKV_thum_mca_prov.jpg
2919 ms
btn_kv_prev.png
2983 ms
btn_kv_next.png
2994 ms
ico_arrow01.png
3070 ms
ico_arrow02.png
2997 ms
ico_service_arrow.png
3010 ms
bg_service_keywords.png
3081 ms
bg_service_stock.png
3406 ms
bg_btm-solid.png
3299 ms
bg_service_visual.png
3339 ms
bg_service_communication.png
3221 ms
bg_service_media.png
3134 ms
mask_radius_4444.png
2850 ms
img_works_dummy.gif
2997 ms
bg_btm-solid_on.png
3049 ms
works_thum_121.png
4227 ms
works_120_thum2.jpg
3178 ms
img_dummy_300x245.gif
2862 ms
bg_pickup01.jpg
3544 ms
bg_pickup02.jpg
3334 ms
bg_white_a80.png
2452 ms
ico_pickup_more.png
2519 ms
img_pickup_dummy.gif
2481 ms
ico_ft_contact.png
2490 ms
ico_ft_info.png
2529 ms
ico_ft_sns.png
2656 ms
btn_ft_twitter.png
2668 ms
btn_ft_fb.png
2656 ms
btn_ft_rss.png
2704 ms
bg_ft_location-head.png
2654 ms
ico_ft_location.png
2647 ms
ico_arrow03.png
2652 ms
bg_link_main.jpg
3037 ms
btn_ft_link01_off.png
2703 ms
btn_ft_link01_on.png
2671 ms
bg_ft_baloon04.png
2685 ms
btn_ft_link02_off.png
2655 ms
btn_ft_link02_on.png
2512 ms
btn_ft_link03_off.png
2637 ms
btn_ft_link03_on.png
2638 ms
btn_ft_link04_off.png
2672 ms
btn_ft_link04_on.png
2669 ms
btn_ft_link05_off.png
2622 ms
btn_ft_link05_on.png
2551 ms
btn_ft_link06_off.png
2522 ms
btn_ft_link06_on.png
2517 ms
logo_ft_isms.png
2497 ms
gtm.js
36 ms
js
58 ms
btn_prev.png
168 ms
btn_next.png
313 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
flipdesk_chat.js
913 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
56 ms
amana.jp accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
amana.jp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
amana.jp SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amana.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Amana.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
amana.jp
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Amana. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: