Tools & Wizards About Us
amba.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

amba.com

AMBA Specifications for On-Chip Connectivity – Arm®

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

363 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

283 ms

amba.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing AMBA content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about amba.com

The Arm AMBA specifications are an open interface standard, used across the industry for on-chip communication, data transfer and connectivity.

Visit amba.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Amba.com page load time and found that the first response time was 363 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

amba.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,900 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

amba-specifications

363 ms

arm-design-system-scoped.css

131 ms

arm-design-system.js

1318 ms

all.css

153 ms

atm.js

242 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Amba.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.designsystem.arm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Arm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (71%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

678.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Amba.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 147.6 kB

  • Original 170.1 kB
  • After minification 123.6 kB
  • After compression 22.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 46.5 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 147.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 40.9 kB
  • After minification 40.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. AMBA images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 615.8 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 425.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 615.8 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 910.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 189.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amba.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 910.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (46%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AMBA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

amba-specifications

amba-specifications

363 ms

arm-design-system-scoped.css

arm-design-system-scoped.css

131 ms

arm-design-system.js

arm-design-system.js

1318 ms

all.css

all.css

153 ms

atm.js

atm.js

242 ms

tags.js

tags.js

98 ms

launch-EN10e66088202b43a3b7f30a6ded39776d.min.js

launch-EN10e66088202b43a3b7f30a6ded39776d.min.js

30 ms

all.js

all.js

103 ms

CoveoFullSearch.css

CoveoFullSearch.css

102 ms

CoveoForSitecore.css

CoveoForSitecore.css

149 ms

CoveoJsSearch.Lazy.min.js

CoveoJsSearch.Lazy.min.js

230 ms

CoveoForSitecore.Lazy.min.js

CoveoForSitecore.Lazy.min.js

254 ms

en.js

en.js

216 ms

CoveoForSitecoreUserContext.js

CoveoForSitecoreUserContext.js

491 ms

de675742-710f-4ef8-bfc7-a5c34e489bdb.css

de675742-710f-4ef8-bfc7-a5c34e489bdb.css

47 ms

css

css

42 ms

reveal

reveal

469 ms

tracking.min.js

tracking.min.js

304 ms

forms.js

forms.js

464 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

231 ms

YX9U9-3CW2M-92JLU-3BLJD-T6LD5

YX9U9-3CW2M-92JLU-3BLJD-T6LD5

252 ms

arm-logo-white-rgb.svg

arm-logo-white-rgb.svg

221 ms

products-nav-224x108.jpg

products-nav-224x108.jpg

463 ms

markets-resource-library-nav-224x108.jpg

markets-resource-library-nav-224x108.jpg

221 ms

arm-total-design-icon-105x105.svg

arm-total-design-icon-105x105.svg

222 ms

arm-partner-program-nav-105x105.svg

arm-partner-program-nav-105x105.svg

454 ms

developers-arm-developer-program-nav-224x108.jpg

developers-arm-developer-program-nav-224x108.jpg

222 ms

support-and-training-on-demand-nav-224x108.jpg

support-and-training-on-demand-nav-224x108.jpg

249 ms

company-on-arm-nav-224x108.jpg

company-on-arm-nav-224x108.jpg

458 ms

products-icon-50x50.svg

products-icon-50x50.svg

457 ms

resource-library-icon-50x50.svg

resource-library-icon-50x50.svg

457 ms

arm-total-design-icon-50x50.svg

arm-total-design-icon-50x50.svg

460 ms

arm-partner-program-icon-50x50.png

arm-partner-program-icon-50x50.png

576 ms

arm-developer-program-icon-50x50.svg

arm-developer-program-icon-50x50.svg

535 ms

on-demand-training-icon-50x50.svg

on-demand-training-icon-50x50.svg

549 ms

a-future-built-on-arm-icon-50x50.svg

a-future-built-on-arm-icon-50x50.svg

536 ms

arm-generic-hero-1920x330.jpg

arm-generic-hero-1920x330.jpg

533 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf

282 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

445 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

477 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

505 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

541 ms

fa-light-300.ttf

fa-light-300.ttf

631 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

585 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

520 ms

css

css

65 ms

p

p

271 ms

config.json

config.json

201 ms

Accessibility Review

amba.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

amba.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

amba.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amba.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Amba.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

amba.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of AMBA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: