Tools & Wizards About Us
ameboclick.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

ameboclick.com

Ram Truck Floor Mats, Grand Cherokee Floor Mats, Customise Car Mats | Xiamen Ameboclick Car Mat Co., Ltd.

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

259 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

476 ms

ameboclick.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ameboclick.com now to see the best up-to-date Ameboclick content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ameboclick.com

Xiamen Ameboclick Car Mat Co., Ltd. is located in the Lockset Town, which takes full advantages of market recourse and industry clusters. Our company integrates R&D, manufacture and sale, and has mor

Visit ameboclick.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ameboclick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 259 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ameboclick.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.065

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ameboclick.com

259 ms

v0.js

49 ms

amp-sidebar-0.1.js

79 ms

amp-form-0.1.js

123 ms

amp-font-0.1.js

116 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Ameboclick.com, 36% (12 requests) were made to Cdn.ampproject.org and 36% (12 requests) were made to Form.grofrom.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Js.users.51.la.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 120.3 kB (17%)

Content Size

714.2 kB

After Optimization

593.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ameboclick.com main page is 714.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 311.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 76.6 kB

  • Original 92.4 kB
  • After minification 86.0 kB
  • After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 303.7 kB
  • After minification 303.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ameboclick images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 42.2 kB

  • Original 311.4 kB
  • After minification 311.4 kB
  • After compression 269.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.2 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 6.7 kB
  • After minification 6.7 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ameboclick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (69%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ameboclick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ameboclick.com

ameboclick.com

259 ms

v0.js

v0.js

49 ms

amp-sidebar-0.1.js

amp-sidebar-0.1.js

79 ms

amp-form-0.1.js

amp-form-0.1.js

123 ms

amp-font-0.1.js

amp-font-0.1.js

116 ms

amp-bind-0.1.js

amp-bind-0.1.js

126 ms

amp-carousel-0.1.js

amp-carousel-0.1.js

125 ms

amp-selector-0.1.js

amp-selector-0.1.js

115 ms

amp-fx-collection-0.1.js

amp-fx-collection-0.1.js

125 ms

amp-video-0.1.js

amp-video-0.1.js

135 ms

amp-lightbox-0.1.js

amp-lightbox-0.1.js

134 ms

amp-base-carousel-0.1.js

amp-base-carousel-0.1.js

133 ms

amp-mustache-0.2.js

amp-mustache-0.2.js

135 ms

all-m.gif

all-m.gif

446 ms

2021092709092148.jpg

2021092709092148.jpg

129 ms

2021092709092250.jpg

2021092709092250.jpg

144 ms

2021092709090211.jpg

2021092709090211.jpg

154 ms

livechat.js

livechat.js

60 ms

21220073.js

21220073.js

1100 ms

livechat.js

livechat.js

41 ms

2024108_inquiry_livechat_ameboclickcom

2024108_inquiry_livechat_ameboclickcom

8 ms

2024108_inquiry_livechat_ameboclickcom

2024108_inquiry_livechat_ameboclickcom

692 ms

MyriadPro-BoldIt.ttf

MyriadPro-BoldIt.ttf

65 ms

Gotham-Bold.otf

Gotham-Bold.otf

128 ms

micon.ttf

micon.ttf

139 ms

from_livechat.css

from_livechat.css

13 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

42 ms

layer.js

layer.js

63 ms

group_oper.js

group_oper.js

30 ms

validform.min.js

validform.min.js

28 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

31 ms

layer.css

layer.css

16 ms

ArialMT.ttf

ArialMT.ttf

271 ms

Accessibility Review

ameboclick.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

ameboclick.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ameboclick.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ameboclick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ameboclick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ameboclick.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ameboclick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: