1.3 sec in total
31 ms
967 ms
335 ms
Click here to check amazing Amelt content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about amelt.com
Find a variety of copper melting furnaces, induction furnaces, iron casting furnaces, and aluminum melting furnaces for sale at Amelt. Shop now
Visit amelt.comWe analyzed Amelt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
amelt.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
84/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value1,980 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
31 ms
24 ms
80 ms
284 ms
243 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Amelt.com, 14% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (679 ms) belongs to the original domain Amelt.com.
Page size can be reduced by 159.8 kB (16%)
975.8 kB
815.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Amelt.com main page is 975.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 563.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 149.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Amelt images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amelt.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (90%)
59
6
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amelt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
amelt.com
31 ms
amelt.com
24 ms
js
80 ms
style.min.css
284 ms
style.css
243 ms
dashicons.min.css
294 ms
mailin-front.css
241 ms
jquery.min.js
298 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
246 ms
lity.min.js
308 ms
mailin-front.js
310 ms
js
103 ms
number-changer.js
39 ms
css
48 ms
basic.min.css
349 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
355 ms
theme.min.css
364 ms
post-87.css
364 ms
be.min.css
480 ms
animations.min.css
373 ms
fontawesome.min.css
409 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.min.css
412 ms
responsive.min.css
419 ms
css
67 ms
rs6.css
420 ms
rbtools.min.js
558 ms
rs6.min.js
581 ms
dlm-xhr.min.js
468 ms
core.min.js
556 ms
tabs.min.js
555 ms
debouncedresize.min.js
556 ms
magnificpopup.min.js
557 ms
menu.min.js
557 ms
visible.min.js
557 ms
animations.min.js
597 ms
jplayer.min.js
631 ms
enllax.min.js
633 ms
translate3d.min.js
633 ms
scripts.min.js
632 ms
accessibility.min.js
656 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
657 ms
api.js
59 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
679 ms
maxmegamenu.js
445 ms
dom-ready.min.js
444 ms
hooks.min.js
441 ms
i18n.min.js
422 ms
a11y.min.js
414 ms
jquery.json.min.js
439 ms
gravityforms.min.js
433 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
399 ms
utils.min.js
403 ms
wARDj0u
6 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
411 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
410 ms
slick.min.js
442 ms
getnumdata.js
23 ms
dummy.png
432 ms
HeaderBgr.jpg
39 ms
HeaderBgr.jpg
436 ms
stripes_10_w.png
330 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
26 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
40 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
60 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
76 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
76 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
77 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
78 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
76 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzcXKMny.ttf
102 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsHYl4BO.ttf
77 ms
icons.woff
286 ms
Amelt-Logo-w.png
184 ms
recaptcha__en.js
56 ms
amelt.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
amelt.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
amelt.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amelt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Amelt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
amelt.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Amelt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: