Tools & Wizards About Us
amfservices.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

amfservices.net

** Advanced Metal Finishing **

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

47 ms

Resources Loaded

920 ms

Page Rendered

301 ms

amfservices.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Amfservices content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about amfservices.net

Home of AMF in Roseville

Visit amfservices.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Amfservices.net page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

amfservices.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

amfservices.net

47 ms

amfauburn.com

70 ms

sites.css

46 ms

fancybox.css

42 ms

social-icons.css

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Amfservices.net, 83% (29 requests) were made to Amfauburn.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (559 ms) relates to the external source Editmysite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 80.1 kB (3%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Amfservices.net main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 108 B

  • Original 380 B
  • After minification 380 B
  • After compression 272 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108 B or 28% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 622 B

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Amfservices images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 55.6 kB

  • Original 505.8 kB
  • After minification 505.8 kB
  • After compression 450.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.6 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 23.8 kB

  • Original 62.4 kB
  • After minification 62.4 kB
  • After compression 38.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amfservices.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (50%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amfservices. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

amfservices.net

amfservices.net

47 ms

amfauburn.com

amfauburn.com

70 ms

sites.css

sites.css

46 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

42 ms

social-icons.css

social-icons.css

43 ms

main_style.css

main_style.css

58 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

43 ms

latinfonts.css

latinfonts.css

59 ms

templateArtifacts.js

templateArtifacts.js

80 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

37 ms

stl.js

stl.js

17 ms

main.js

main.js

139 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

81 ms

custom.js

custom.js

78 ms

mobile.js

mobile.js

78 ms

main-customer-accounts-site.js

main-customer-accounts-site.js

29 ms

generateMap.php

generateMap.php

559 ms

amf-v5_1.jpg

amf-v5_1.jpg

43 ms

b-roll_131.jpg

b-roll_131.jpg

70 ms

630181362.png

630181362.png

85 ms

facebook-icon.png

facebook-icon.png

45 ms

linkin-logo.png

linkin-logo.png

40 ms

google-places.png

google-places.png

46 ms

nasf.png

nasf.png

61 ms

image004_orig.jpg

image004_orig.jpg

64 ms

rohs.png

rohs.png

80 ms

loading-icon.png

loading-icon.png

67 ms

play-icon.png

play-icon.png

86 ms

gradient.png

gradient.png

88 ms

136 ms

267447_4_0.woff

267447_4_0.woff

83 ms

267447_5_0.woff

267447_5_0.woff

92 ms

267447_4_0.ttf

267447_4_0.ttf

25 ms

267447_5_0.ttf

267447_5_0.ttf

24 ms

js

js

50 ms

Accessibility Review

amfservices.net accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

amfservices.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

amfservices.net SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amfservices.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Amfservices.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

amfservices.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Amfservices. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: