1.3 sec in total
41 ms
1 sec
213 ms
Visit ammfencing.com now to see the best up-to-date AMM Fencing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ammfencing.com
Visit ammfencing.com
We analyzed Ammfencing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 41 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
ammfencing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value1,980 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
41 ms
640 ms
48 ms
35 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Ammfencing.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (640 ms) belongs to the original domain Ammfencing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 62.7 kB (10%)
619.4 kB
556.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ammfencing.com main page is 619.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 280.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. AMM Fencing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 389 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 317 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ammfencing.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (93%)
45
3
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AMM Fencing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ammfencing.com
41 ms
ammfencing.com
640 ms
css2
48 ms
style.min.css
35 ms
style.min.css
40 ms
theme.min.css
47 ms
header-footer.min.css
59 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
52 ms
post-5.css
42 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
67 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
56 ms
post-92.css
59 ms
general.min.css
69 ms
css
54 ms
fontawesome.min.css
69 ms
solid.min.css
73 ms
page-transitions.min.js
77 ms
jquery.min.js
78 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
88 ms
jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js
88 ms
js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js
101 ms
public.js
97 ms
js
69 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
122 ms
instant-page.min.js
89 ms
general.min.js
122 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
120 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
125 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
126 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
138 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
140 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
141 ms
hooks.min.js
139 ms
i18n.min.js
138 ms
frontend.min.js
155 ms
waypoints.min.js
206 ms
core.min.js
206 ms
frontend.min.js
156 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
196 ms
scc-c2.min.js
9 ms
tti.min.js
9 ms
fbevents.js
60 ms
hotjar-2951416.js
165 ms
Lattice-Piano-key-copy-1024x660.jpg
159 ms
js
89 ms
analytics.js
126 ms
js
125 ms
ammfencing.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ammfencing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ammfencing.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ammfencing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ammfencing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ammfencing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of AMM Fencing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: