Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

Page Load Speed

13.1 sec in total

First Response

4.8 sec

Resources Loaded

8.2 sec

Page Rendered

151 ms

amoreo.pl screenshot

About Website

Visit amoreo.pl now to see the best up-to-date Amoreo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about amoreo.pl

Visit amoreo.pl

Key Findings

We analyzed Amoreo.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 4.8 sec and then it took 8.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

amoreo.pl performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.094

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

amoreo.pl

4810 ms

amoreo.pl

803 ms

newlook.css

353 ms

jquery.multiSelect.css

347 ms

jquery.tooltip.css

349 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Amoreo.pl, 83% (43 requests) were made to Static.aftermarket.pl and 4% (2 requests) were made to Aftermarket.pl. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Amoreo.pl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 562.7 kB (75%)

Content Size

755.3 kB

After Optimization

192.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Amoreo.pl main page is 755.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 624.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 36.1 kB

  • Original 46.7 kB
  • After minification 42.4 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 25.5 kB
  • After minification 9.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Amoreo needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 61% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 463.1 kB

  • Original 624.2 kB
  • After minification 576.1 kB
  • After compression 161.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 463.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 47.8 kB

  • Original 58.9 kB
  • After minification 46.5 kB
  • After compression 11.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amoreo.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (76%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amoreo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

amoreo.pl accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

amoreo.pl best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

amoreo.pl SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    PL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amoreo.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Polish. Our system also found out that Amoreo.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Amoreo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: