Tools & Wizards About Us
amosa-group.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

amosa-group.com

Asset Management | Enterprise Asset Management Maximo solutions Amosa

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

71 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

57 ms

amosa-group.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to amosa-group.com homepage info - get ready to check Amosa Group best content right away, or after learning these important things about amosa-group.com

Amosa helps using Maximo Asset Management implementation and best practices for your company using best practices. With our years of experience helping companies achieving realistic results with Maxim...

Visit amosa-group.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Amosa-group.com page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

amosa-group.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.amosa-group.com

71 ms

minified.js

51 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

49 ms

polyfill.min.js

255 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Amosa-group.com, 40% (19 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 27% (13 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (762 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 427.1 kB (56%)

Content Size

766.8 kB

After Optimization

339.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Amosa-group.com main page is 766.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 467.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 366.9 kB

  • Original 467.7 kB
  • After minification 466.0 kB
  • After compression 100.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 366.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 932 B

  • Original 22.3 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Amosa Group images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 59.3 kB

  • Original 276.8 kB
  • After minification 276.8 kB
  • After compression 217.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.3 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (61%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amosa Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.amosa-group.com

www.amosa-group.com

71 ms

minified.js

minified.js

51 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

49 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

255 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

81 ms

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

46 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

81 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

44 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

82 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

78 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

79 ms

Amosa%20Group.png

Amosa%20Group.png

226 ms

ae1a16_8dccd11d059d42fe9aa007b305d16433~mv2.png

ae1a16_8dccd11d059d42fe9aa007b305d16433~mv2.png

431 ms

transparent%20light%20blue.png

transparent%20light%20blue.png

454 ms

transparent%20light%20blue.png

transparent%20light%20blue.png

607 ms

shutterstock_761907082.jpg

shutterstock_761907082.jpg

584 ms

transparent%20light%20blue.png

transparent%20light%20blue.png

434 ms

transparent%20light%20blue.png

transparent%20light%20blue.png

447 ms

shutterstock_720121006.jpg

shutterstock_720121006.jpg

685 ms

transparent%20light%20blue.png

transparent%20light%20blue.png

530 ms

transparent%20light%20blue.png

transparent%20light%20blue.png

543 ms

shutterstock_737504116.jpg

shutterstock_737504116.jpg

762 ms

transparent%20light%20blue.png

transparent%20light%20blue.png

626 ms

transparent%20light%20blue.png

transparent%20light%20blue.png

638 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

44 ms

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

38 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

39 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

40 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

39 ms

105 ms

104 ms

103 ms

101 ms

102 ms

103 ms

142 ms

140 ms

138 ms

134 ms

138 ms

137 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

16 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

4 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

9 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

5 ms

Accessibility Review

amosa-group.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

amosa-group.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

amosa-group.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amosa-group.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Amosa-group.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

amosa-group.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Amosa Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: