Tools & Wizards About Us
andamanpackers.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

andamanpackers.com

Andaman Packers and Movers,Portblair Packers and Movers,Best Packers in Andaman

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

569 ms

andamanpackers.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to andamanpackers.com homepage info - get ready to check Andaman Packers best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about andamanpackers.com

Top Packers in Andaman- Andaman Packers provide car shifting, local shifting in india, packaging unpacking services, packing moving in portblair available here

Visit andamanpackers.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Andamanpackers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

andamanpackers.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.261

47/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

andamanpackers.com

49 ms

www.andamanpackers.com

50 ms

bootstrap.css

52 ms

bootstrap.min.css

43 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Andamanpackers.com, 16% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Leopackersindia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 552.6 kB (18%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Andamanpackers.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 50.8 kB

  • Original 61.2 kB
  • After minification 43.3 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.9 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 144.8 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Andaman Packers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 104.9 kB

  • Original 235.0 kB
  • After minification 233.1 kB
  • After compression 130.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 104.9 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 252.1 kB

  • Original 299.0 kB
  • After minification 268.6 kB
  • After compression 46.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Andamanpackers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 252.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (38%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Andaman Packers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

andamanpackers.com

andamanpackers.com

49 ms

www.andamanpackers.com

www.andamanpackers.com

50 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

52 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

43 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

22 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

36 ms

move-top.js

move-top.js

25 ms

easing.js

easing.js

23 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

21 ms

theme-style.css

theme-style.css

34 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

css

css

24 ms

responsiveslides.min.js

responsiveslides.min.js

29 ms

custom_code_by_amit.js

custom_code_by_amit.js

260 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

264 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

263 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

1751 ms

embed

embed

348 ms

slider-img1c.jpg

slider-img1c.jpg

87 ms

slider-img2c.jpg

slider-img2c.jpg

86 ms

slider-img3c.jpg

slider-img3c.jpg

82 ms

slider-img4c.jpg

slider-img4c.jpg

83 ms

logo-new.jpg

logo-new.jpg

50 ms

about-icons.png

about-icons.png

55 ms

i1.png

i1.png

56 ms

i2.png

i2.png

56 ms

i3.png

i3.png

80 ms

s1.png

s1.png

82 ms

s2.png

s2.png

86 ms

s3.png

s3.png

86 ms

s4.png

s4.png

86 ms

s5.png

s5.png

86 ms

s6.png

s6.png

86 ms

s7.png

s7.png

87 ms

s8.png

s8.png

87 ms

s9.png

s9.png

88 ms

s10.png

s10.png

87 ms

morearrow.png

morearrow.png

87 ms

lessarrow.png

lessarrow.png

88 ms

test-bg.jpg

test-bg.jpg

89 ms

cer.png

cer.png

88 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

17 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

44 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

49 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

46 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

48 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

48 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

49 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

49 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

49 ms

fontawesome-webfontba72.woff

fontawesome-webfontba72.woff

85 ms

js

js

29 ms

search.js

search.js

4 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

13 ms

Accessibility Review

andamanpackers.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

andamanpackers.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

andamanpackers.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Andamanpackers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Andamanpackers.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

andamanpackers.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Andaman Packers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: