Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

andersfg.com

AAFG Florida Retirement Events – AAFG Florida Retirement Blog

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

71 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

345 ms

andersfg.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to andersfg.com homepage info - get ready to check Andersfg best content right away, or after learning these important things about andersfg.com

Visit andersfg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Andersfg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

andersfg.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,590 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.083

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value30.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

andersfg.com

71 ms

andersfg.com

30 ms

style.min.css

11 ms

style.css

15 ms

5698-layout.css

42 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Andersfg.com, 14% (13 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Andersfg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 663.9 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Andersfg.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 74.0 kB

  • Original 92.4 kB
  • After minification 90.1 kB
  • After compression 18.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 433.8 kB
  • After minification 425.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Andersfg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 490.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 658.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 490.1 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 91.1 kB

  • Original 193.6 kB
  • After minification 193.3 kB
  • After compression 102.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Andersfg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.1 kB or 47% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (79%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Andersfg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

andersfg.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

andersfg.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

andersfg.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Andersfg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Andersfg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Andersfg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: