2.8 sec in total
341 ms
1.6 sec
922 ms
Visit andersonsbride.com now to see the best up-to-date Anderson Sbride content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about andersonsbride.com
Visit andersonsbride.comWe analyzed Andersonsbride.com page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
andersonsbride.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value240 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.529
14/100
15%
Value5.3 s
72/100
10%
341 ms
65 ms
129 ms
186 ms
195 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Andersonsbride.com, 25% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (605 ms) belongs to the original domain Andersonsbride.com.
Page size can be reduced by 239.8 kB (7%)
3.6 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Andersonsbride.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 191.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 191.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Anderson Sbride images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 94 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 73 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Andersonsbride.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (54%)
52
24
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Anderson Sbride. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
andersonsbride.com
341 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
65 ms
styles.css
129 ms
style.min.css
186 ms
latest.css
195 ms
style.min.css
191 ms
style.css
242 ms
style.css
248 ms
jquery.min.js
310 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
255 ms
lovely-custom-scripts.js
256 ms
custom.js
306 ms
coblocks-animation.js
302 ms
tiny-swiper.js
389 ms
coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js
390 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
389 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
391 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
458 ms
hooks.min.js
391 ms
i18n.min.js
390 ms
index.js
391 ms
index.js
392 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
428 ms
matchheight-init.js
438 ms
scripts.min.js
493 ms
smoothscroll.js
449 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
449 ms
jquery.mobile.js
487 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
493 ms
common.js
509 ms
sbi-sprite.png
181 ms
Untitled-design-2.png
206 ms
preloader3.gif
221 ms
267626940_5084074378289056_757058012285502725_n.jpg
286 ms
the-knot.png
346 ms
100835125_3401612059868638_365634220925648896_n.jpg
493 ms
245331222_4877684212261408_3225817892570479554_n.jpg
433 ms
254164644_4968044259892069_435879291635976186_n.jpg
432 ms
241289505_4786439264719237_5548865959076535052_n.jpg
405 ms
254630117_4967987359897759_5762753178047967553_n.jpg
349 ms
Screen-Shot-2022-01-11-at-10.58.39-PM.jpeg
605 ms
Screenshot-2022-01-11-at-11.36.25-PM.jpeg
411 ms
238876967_4699005763462588_7498786552545460199_n.jpg
603 ms
240725386_4742237142472783_9044849004058259265_n.jpg
473 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-221582-tb-221578-219499-late.css
448 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaHUlM.woff
18 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaHUlP.ttf
23 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDypqaHUlM.woff
29 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDypqaHUlP.ttf
35 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDppqaHUlM.woff
41 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDppqaHUlP.ttf
42 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDeJqaHUlM.woff
41 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDeJqaHUlP.ttf
40 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDJp2aHUlM.woff
33 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDJp2aHUlP.ttf
42 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aHUlM.woff
43 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aHUlP.ttf
44 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDeJ2aHUlM.woff
47 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDeJ2aHUlP.ttf
46 ms
modules.woff
541 ms
VdGeAZQPEpYfmHglGWsxDw.woff
46 ms
VdGeAZQPEpYfmHglGWsxDA.ttf
53 ms
esDR31xSG-6AGleN2tuklg.woff
53 ms
esDR31xSG-6AGleN2tuklQ.ttf
54 ms
shadow0.png
67 ms
thomas-ae-KRPCwGCzUJs-unsplash-1-scaled.jpg
123 ms
maggie-sottero.jpg
67 ms
rebecca-ingram.jpg
68 ms
justin-alexander.jpg
79 ms
evelyn-1.jpg
66 ms
lillian-west.jpg
130 ms
sammie-chaffin-chhdIbuvgsg-unsplash-scaled.jpg
131 ms
andersonsbride.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
andersonsbride.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
andersonsbride.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Andersonsbride.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Andersonsbride.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
andersonsbride.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Anderson Sbride. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: