Tools & Wizards About Us
andesfence.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

andesfence.com

Andes Fence | Fence and Gate Company in Broward County

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

333 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

521 ms

andesfence.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to andesfence.com homepage info - get ready to check Andes Fence best content right away, or after learning these important things about andesfence.com

We are a Full-Service Fence & Gate company in South Florida, covering all Broward, Miami-Dade, and Palm Beach county. Family owned & operated since 1994.

Visit andesfence.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Andesfence.com page load time and found that the first response time was 333 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

andesfence.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,490 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

andesfence.com

333 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

98 ms

hd6vd.css

168 ms

hd6vd.css

186 ms

hd6vd.css

247 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Andesfence.com, 18% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (724 ms) belongs to the original domain Andesfence.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 123.7 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Andesfence.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 951.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 111.1 kB

  • Original 131.1 kB
  • After minification 127.0 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 951.5 kB
  • After minification 943.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Andes Fence images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 556.9 kB
  • After minification 556.9 kB
  • After compression 552.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 900 B

  • Original 131.5 kB
  • After minification 131.5 kB
  • After compression 130.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Andesfence.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (75%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Andes Fence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

andesfence.com

andesfence.com

333 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

98 ms

hd6vd.css

hd6vd.css

168 ms

hd6vd.css

hd6vd.css

186 ms

hd6vd.css

hd6vd.css

247 ms

hd6vd.css

hd6vd.css

249 ms

post-826.css

post-826.css

185 ms

hd6va.css

hd6va.css

313 ms

post-424.css

post-424.css

256 ms

css

css

34 ms

css

css

48 ms

ivj.css

ivj.css

257 ms

hd6vd.js

hd6vd.js

329 ms

platform.js

platform.js

32 ms

post-757.css

post-757.css

325 ms

hd6v9.css

hd6v9.css

325 ms

css

css

25 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

323 ms

navigation.min.js

navigation.min.js

324 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

436 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

438 ms

api.js

api.js

64 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

435 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

436 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

437 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

436 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

537 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

537 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

537 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

545 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

544 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

536 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

632 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

714 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

630 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

634 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

630 ms

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

635 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

720 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

720 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

721 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

724 ms

platform.js

platform.js

37 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

15 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

662 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

200 ms

andesfence-logo.png

andesfence-logo.png

428 ms

71282412_2702963413048129_5585130086798983168_o.jpg

71282412_2702963413048129_5585130086798983168_o.jpg

662 ms

fence-maintenance-in-fort-lauderdale.jpg

fence-maintenance-in-fort-lauderdale.jpg

550 ms

andes-fence-team.jpg

andes-fence-team.jpg

486 ms

fence-installation-in-fort-lauderdale.jpg

fence-installation-in-fort-lauderdale.jpg

609 ms

chain-link-installation-pembroke-pines-01.jpg

chain-link-installation-pembroke-pines-01.jpg

553 ms

halladale.jpg

halladale.jpg

501 ms

sbdd-logo.png

sbdd-logo.png

550 ms

Seal_of_Coconut_Creek_Florida.png

Seal_of_Coconut_Creek_Florida.png

567 ms

broward-college-former-partner-andes-fence.jpg

broward-college-former-partner-andes-fence.jpg

619 ms

associa.jpg

associa.jpg

615 ms

andesfence-logo-ofrthocawxhz7vutd1ptfcva6ceww7nop6zb0ajtgq.png

andesfence-logo-ofrthocawxhz7vutd1ptfcva6ceww7nop6zb0ajtgq.png

622 ms

embed

embed

226 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

118 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

137 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

133 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

133 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

137 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

136 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

595 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

135 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

136 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

135 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

182 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

183 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

182 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

182 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

182 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

181 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

559 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

636 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

147 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

512 ms

js

js

92 ms

search.js

search.js

5 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

11 ms

main.js

main.js

18 ms

261 ms

Accessibility Review

andesfence.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

andesfence.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

andesfence.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Andesfence.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Andesfence.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

andesfence.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Andes Fence. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: