Tools & Wizards About Us
anfieldindex.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

anfieldindex.com

Anfield Index

Page Load Speed

13.2 sec in total

First Response

634 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

8.3 sec

anfieldindex.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Anfield Index content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about anfieldindex.com

Delivering 75+ FREE LFC podcasts every month. Join our podcasters, LFC legends, pro analysts and top journalists for match previews, reviews, data analysis and transfer gossip. By Liverpool fans, for ...

Visit anfieldindex.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Anfieldindex.com page load time and found that the first response time was 634 ms and then it took 12.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

anfieldindex.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.8 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,050 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

anfieldindex.com

634 ms

PW7MAG-_nY4wifTRgGi3BdGgZPI.js

53 ms

style.css

89 ms

css

212 ms

icon

312 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Anfieldindex.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Anfieldindex.api.oneall.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 235.0 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Anfieldindex.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 148.7 kB

  • Original 173.8 kB
  • After minification 134.2 kB
  • After compression 25.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 39.6 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 148.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 53.8 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Anfield Index images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

  • Original 169.5 kB
  • After minification 169.5 kB
  • After compression 137.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 145 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 915 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Anfieldindex.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 145 B or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (62%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Anfield Index. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

anfieldindex.com

anfieldindex.com

634 ms

PW7MAG-_nY4wifTRgGi3BdGgZPI.js

PW7MAG-_nY4wifTRgGi3BdGgZPI.js

53 ms

style.css

style.css

89 ms

css

css

212 ms

icon

icon

312 ms

js

js

250 ms

theme.css

theme.css

114 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

114 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

597 ms

styles.css

styles.css

134 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

135 ms

widget-options.css

widget-options.css

535 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

134 ms

front-style.css

front-style.css

134 ms

style2-os.css

style2-os.css

508 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

509 ms

wp_shopping_cart_style.css

wp_shopping_cart_style.css

496 ms

form-themes.min.css

form-themes.min.css

506 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

522 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

737 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

725 ms

general.js

general.js

724 ms

library.js

library.js

1047 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

720 ms

script.js

script.js

807 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

882 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

720 ms

jquery.widgetopts.min.js

jquery.widgetopts.min.js

836 ms

portfolio-all.js

portfolio-all.js

831 ms

jquery.colorbox.js

jquery.colorbox.js

833 ms

jquery.hugeitmicro.min.js

jquery.hugeitmicro.min.js

818 ms

OneSignalSDK.js

OneSignalSDK.js

773 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

790 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

443 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

240 ms

collect

collect

197 ms

collect

collect

60 ms

collect

collect

76 ms

collect

collect

37 ms

anfield2.jpg

anfield2.jpg

455 ms

anfield-index-placeholder.png

anfield-index-placeholder.png

206 ms

safebettingsites-anfieldindex-banner.jpg

safebettingsites-anfieldindex-banner.jpg

206 ms

fbs.png

fbs.png

177 ms

BetBlazers-300x200.png

BetBlazers-300x200.png

512 ms

BookiesBonuses-300x200.png

BookiesBonuses-300x200.png

511 ms

aucanada-2.png

aucanada-2.png

512 ms

anfield-index-logo-large.png

anfield-index-logo-large.png

174 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

599 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf

595 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

656 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

650 ms

flUhRq6tzZclQEJ-Vdg-IuiaDsNZ.ttf

flUhRq6tzZclQEJ-Vdg-IuiaDsNZ.ttf

948 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

871 ms

WidgetScript

WidgetScript

864 ms

anfield-index-logo-white.png

anfield-index-logo-white.png

349 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

208 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

393 ms

Trent-England.png

Trent-England.png

207 ms

PR-MUNLIV.png

PR-MUNLIV.png

209 ms

Thiago.png

Thiago.png

935 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

330 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

345 ms

widget_iframe.c4bdc17e77719578b594d5555bee90db.html

widget_iframe.c4bdc17e77719578b594d5555bee90db.html

169 ms

settings

settings

92 ms

LIVAJAPR.png

LIVAJAPR.png

21 ms

sodar

sodar

98 ms

Accessibility Review

anfieldindex.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

anfieldindex.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

anfieldindex.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Anfieldindex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Anfieldindex.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

anfieldindex.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Anfield Index. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: