Tools & Wizards About Us
angiesaesthetics.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

angiesaesthetics.com

Angie's Aesthetics-Home

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

112 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

230 ms

angiesaesthetics.com screenshot

About Website

Visit angiesaesthetics.com now to see the best up-to-date Angie S Aesthetics content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about angiesaesthetics.com

Las Vegas Microdermabrasion, Las Vegas Aesthetician, Las Vegas Esthetician, Las Vegas Spa, Las Vegas Facials, Las Vegas Skin Care, Las Vegas Glymed

Visit angiesaesthetics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Angiesaesthetics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 112 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

angiesaesthetics.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,190 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.4 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

angiesaesthetics.com

112 ms

angiesaesthetics.com

70 ms

index.html

29 ms

gdprscript.js

315 ms

sites.css

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Angiesaesthetics.com, 45% (28 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (339 ms) relates to the external source Yelp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 140.6 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Angiesaesthetics.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 687.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 33.4 kB

  • Original 43.0 kB
  • After minification 42.4 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 436.4 kB
  • After minification 431.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Angie S Aesthetics images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 80.3 kB

  • Original 687.7 kB
  • After minification 642.8 kB
  • After compression 607.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 80.3 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 22.3 kB

  • Original 123.3 kB
  • After minification 120.3 kB
  • After compression 101.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Angiesaesthetics.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.3 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (54%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Angie S Aesthetics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

angiesaesthetics.com

angiesaesthetics.com

112 ms

angiesaesthetics.com

angiesaesthetics.com

70 ms

index.html

index.html

29 ms

gdprscript.js

gdprscript.js

315 ms

sites.css

sites.css

18 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

21 ms

social-icons.css

social-icons.css

24 ms

main_style.css

main_style.css

68 ms

font.css

font.css

22 ms

font.css

font.css

21 ms

font.css

font.css

22 ms

slideshow.css

slideshow.css

85 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

23 ms

stl.js

stl.js

25 ms

main.js

main.js

31 ms

slideshow-jq.js

slideshow-jq.js

23 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

86 ms

custom.js

custom.js

61 ms

main-customer-accounts-site.js

main-customer-accounts-site.js

30 ms

1HIMDpTKxW0

1HIMDpTKxW0

147 ms

1461687878.png

1461687878.png

40 ms

2110834879.jpg

2110834879.jpg

41 ms

phoneloveyelp_orig.png

phoneloveyelp_orig.png

141 ms

3196845.jpg

3196845.jpg

53 ms

al12-16.png

al12-16.png

141 ms

785351_orig.png

785351_orig.png

142 ms

315-train-anime-v4-5b1-5d-2.gif

315-train-anime-v4-5b1-5d-2.gif

143 ms

VtgtqpbtFi3AWFwkoWkCog.js

VtgtqpbtFi3AWFwkoWkCog.js

110 ms

wsocial.woff

wsocial.woff

16 ms

regular.woff

regular.woff

16 ms

bold.woff

bold.woff

16 ms

regular.woff

regular.woff

16 ms

light.woff

light.woff

16 ms

bold.woff

bold.woff

16 ms

bolditalic.woff

bolditalic.woff

103 ms

italic.woff

italic.woff

17 ms

lightitalic.woff

lightitalic.woff

17 ms

bold.woff

bold.woff

16 ms

regular.woff

regular.woff

17 ms

light.woff

light.woff

17 ms

VtgtqpbtFi3AWFwkoWkCog.js

VtgtqpbtFi3AWFwkoWkCog.js

339 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

38 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

70 ms

base.js

base.js

117 ms

ga.js

ga.js

100 ms

snowday262.js

snowday262.js

52 ms

review1_orig.jpg

review1_orig.jpg

67 ms

review4_orig.jpg

review4_orig.jpg

302 ms

review2_orig.jpg

review2_orig.jpg

68 ms

control_icons.gif

control_icons.gif

22 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

33 ms

310 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

172 ms

vbkapfeAy33t-zFWekGq0V21dvEp2e-S_0wOHkCyMZ0.js

vbkapfeAy33t-zFWekGq0V21dvEp2e-S_0wOHkCyMZ0.js

127 ms

embed.js

embed.js

55 ms

VtgtqpbtFi3AWFwkoWkCog.js

VtgtqpbtFi3AWFwkoWkCog.js

172 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

54 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

62 ms

id

id

30 ms

loading-white-w24.gif

loading-white-w24.gif

27 ms

Create

Create

88 ms

tp2

tp2

174 ms

Accessibility Review

angiesaesthetics.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

angiesaesthetics.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

angiesaesthetics.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Angiesaesthetics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Angiesaesthetics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

angiesaesthetics.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Angie S Aesthetics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: