6.2 sec in total
1.3 sec
4.5 sec
405 ms
Welcome to angioclinic.ru homepage info - get ready to check Angioclinic best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about angioclinic.ru
Инновационный сосудистый центр +7 800 222 11 70 —
Visit angioclinic.ruWe analyzed Angioclinic.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
angioclinic.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value3.3 s
70/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value2,330 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value21.6 s
1/100
10%
1312 ms
905 ms
424 ms
1242 ms
599 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Angioclinic.ru, 3% (1 request) were made to Consultsystems.ru and 3% (1 request) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Angioclinic.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 159.3 kB (32%)
501.9 kB
342.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Angioclinic.ru main page is 501.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 307.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Angioclinic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 87.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Angioclinic.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (53%)
34
16
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Angioclinic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
angioclinic.ru
1312 ms
base.css
905 ms
demo.css
424 ms
jquery-1.7.min.js
1242 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
599 ms
tms-0.4.1.js
1105 ms
demo.js
422 ms
highlight.js
597 ms
html5.js
597 ms
html-xml.js
748 ms
javascript.js
747 ms
540 ms
css.js
447 ms
bg_tabs.gif
167 ms
bg_tabs_r.gif
167 ms
bg_star.gif
168 ms
telefon.jpg
311 ms
bg_subtabs.gif
167 ms
ico_inner.gif
169 ms
bg_head.gif
309 ms
logoslogan.jpg
588 ms
kremlin.jpg
453 ms
bg_menu.gif
311 ms
bt_find.gif
311 ms
title(2).jpg
740 ms
bg_li.gif
438 ms
r_greentop.gif
447 ms
bt_login.gif
446 ms
r_greendown.gif
571 ms
bt_question.jpg
579 ms
ico_q.gif
584 ms
h_57008c0edf376e0dad376dc912b54a9c
1028 ms
h_894c2964b008c68412e5328cdb05f52f
1187 ms
h_11fbf65d428c831ef01135a236f64c90
2092 ms
h_424dc632142edfcad7e9d7096bf6cf1a
2005 ms
ico_phone.gif
783 ms
hit
301 ms
watch.js
0 ms
angioclinic.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
angioclinic.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
angioclinic.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Angioclinic.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Angioclinic.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
angioclinic.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Angioclinic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: