Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

animal-rights.com

The Animal Rights FAQ

Page Load Speed

187 ms in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

174 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

animal-rights.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Animal Rights content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about animal-rights.com

The Animal Rights FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Visit animal-rights.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Animal-rights.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 174 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

animal-rights.com performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

animal-rights.com

13 ms

animal-rights.com

37 ms

www.animal-rights.com

44 ms

js

61 ms

piglet.jpg

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Animal-rights.com, 20% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (61 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.1 kB (5%)

Content Size

59.2 kB

After Optimization

56.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Animal-rights.com main page is 59.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 58.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 573 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 618 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 573 B or 48% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 58.0 kB
  • After minification 55.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Animal Rights images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Animal Rights. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

animal-rights.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

animal-rights.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

animal-rights.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Animal-rights.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Animal-rights.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Animal Rights. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: