Tools & Wizards About Us
animationdok.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

animationdok.com

Account Suspended

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

158 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

792 ms

animationdok.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to animationdok.com homepage info - get ready to check Animationdok best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about animationdok.com

Visit animationdok.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Animationdok.com page load time and found that the first response time was 158 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

animationdok.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,470 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.093

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

animationdok.com

158 ms

animationdok.com

504 ms

stylesheet.css

161 ms

responsive.css

230 ms

bootstrap.css

372 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Animationdok.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Animationdok.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 390.0 kB (17%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Animationdok.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-95%

Potential reduce by 208.9 kB

  • Original 219.0 kB
  • After minification 103.7 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 115.3 kB, which is 53% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 208.9 kB or 95% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 102.6 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Animationdok images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 43.1 kB

  • Original 279.3 kB
  • After minification 279.3 kB
  • After compression 236.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 35.5 kB

  • Original 122.2 kB
  • After minification 122.2 kB
  • After compression 86.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Animationdok.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (36%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Animationdok. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

animationdok.com

animationdok.com

158 ms

animationdok.com

animationdok.com

504 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

161 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

230 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

372 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

32 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

230 ms

m-style.css

m-style.css

445 ms

style.css

style.css

304 ms

logo.png

logo.png

381 ms

sh1.png

sh1.png

522 ms

sh2.png

sh2.png

803 ms

sh3.png

sh3.png

661 ms

sh4.png

sh4.png

722 ms

sh5.png

sh5.png

644 ms

sh6.png

sh6.png

934 ms

sh7.png

sh7.png

650 ms

sh8.png

sh8.png

863 ms

img-2.png

img-2.png

797 ms

icon-01.png

icon-01.png

665 ms

icon-02.png

icon-02.png

733 ms

icon-03.png

icon-03.png

739 ms

icon-04.png

icon-04.png

801 ms

portfolio-01.jpg

portfolio-01.jpg

803 ms

portfolio-02.jpg

portfolio-02.jpg

958 ms

portfolio-03.jpg

portfolio-03.jpg

861 ms

portfolio-04.jpg

portfolio-04.jpg

868 ms

portfolio-05.jpg

portfolio-05.jpg

1113 ms

portfolio-06.jpg

portfolio-06.jpg

874 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

929 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

931 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

11 ms

mlib.js

mlib.js

1011 ms

functions.js

functions.js

956 ms

inputMask.js

inputMask.js

1003 ms

fancybox.js

fancybox.js

1005 ms

location-01.png

location-01.png

1111 ms

phone-01.png

phone-01.png

1111 ms

email-01.png

email-01.png

1113 ms

css2

css2

32 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1hvEv-L.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1hvEv-L.woff

23 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1hvEv-L.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1hvEv-L.woff

39 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1hvEv-L.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1hvEv-L.woff

54 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1hvEv-L.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1hvEv-L.woff

55 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedHFHGPc.woff

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedHFHGPc.woff

54 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

80 ms

Accessibility Review

animationdok.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

animationdok.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

animationdok.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Animationdok.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Animationdok.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

animationdok.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Animationdok. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: