Tools & Wizards About Us
anonup.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

anonup.com

AnonUp

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

267 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

560 ms

anonup.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Anon Up content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about anonup.com

AnonUp.com Patriot Platform. \'If not us, who? If not now, when?\'

Visit anonup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Anonup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 267 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

anonup.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

anonup.com

267 ms

guest

650 ms

animate.min.css

109 ms

css-libs.css

205 ms

master.styles.css

389 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Anonup.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (665 ms) belongs to the original domain Anonup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 513.1 kB (46%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

603.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Anonup.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 654.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 86.2 kB

  • Original 115.3 kB
  • After minification 112.7 kB
  • After compression 29.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 288.9 kB
  • After minification 280.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Anon Up images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 409.0 kB

  • Original 654.5 kB
  • After minification 654.4 kB
  • After compression 245.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 409.0 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 57.8 kB
  • After minification 57.8 kB
  • After compression 48.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Anonup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (59%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Anon Up. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

anonup.com

anonup.com

267 ms

guest

guest

650 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

109 ms

css-libs.css

css-libs.css

205 ms

master.styles.css

master.styles.css

389 ms

ib-custom.styles.css

ib-custom.styles.css

284 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

295 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

413 ms

vue-v2.6.11.min.js

vue-v2.6.11.min.js

426 ms

validators.min.js

validators.min.js

307 ms

vuelidate.min.js

vuelidate.min.js

378 ms

jquery.form-v4.2.2.min.js

jquery.form-v4.2.2.min.js

410 ms

popper.1.12.9.min.js

popper.1.12.9.min.js

424 ms

bootstrap.v4.0.0.min.js

bootstrap.v4.0.0.min.js

474 ms

afterglow.min.js

afterglow.min.js

586 ms

jquery.sticky-sidebar.js

jquery.sticky-sidebar.js

483 ms

master.script.js

master.script.js

495 ms

clipboard.min.js

clipboard.min.js

506 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

665 ms

lozad.min.js

lozad.min.js

576 ms

waitMe.min.js

waitMe.min.js

637 ms

txt.autoresize.min.js

txt.autoresize.min.js

637 ms

audio-recorder.js

audio-recorder.js

637 ms

logo.png

logo.png

97 ms

img-1.png

img-1.png

196 ms

img-2.png

img-2.png

100 ms

img-3.png

img-3.png

98 ms

WkYNefiuxMwsk7xEBsS4_09_595cff8fc264affe627b129961e63280_thumbnail_512x512.jpg

WkYNefiuxMwsk7xEBsS4_09_595cff8fc264affe627b129961e63280_thumbnail_512x512.jpg

97 ms

avatar.png

avatar.png

487 ms

btxGrUEPxCCddVXH6vM7_09_efd44f19d8afc8a46078f39ab17d7a95_thumbnail_512x512.jpeg

btxGrUEPxCCddVXH6vM7_09_efd44f19d8afc8a46078f39ab17d7a95_thumbnail_512x512.jpeg

189 ms

8xnmDTqfzzEgQxB2TlUE_06_b743f12128cbed8b4925b4a937dabfe7_thumbnail_512x512.jpg

8xnmDTqfzzEgQxB2TlUE_06_b743f12128cbed8b4925b4a937dabfe7_thumbnail_512x512.jpg

281 ms

CIx4Q1HIlIeukqyHcBNp_23_24c88d57bf80cb635a4c9a49a0238775_thumbnail_512x512.jpg

CIx4Q1HIlIeukqyHcBNp_23_24c88d57bf80cb635a4c9a49a0238775_thumbnail_512x512.jpg

189 ms

gmPk3gULMmXBcyOc11On_08_88b19b3b4cb6ea612e795d2cb076335c_thumbnail_512x512.png

gmPk3gULMmXBcyOc11On_08_88b19b3b4cb6ea612e795d2cb076335c_thumbnail_512x512.png

195 ms

VmhqBJAwrt44D9w5c6v6_17_d8e832f9a863b69ac192096223c6ae47_thumbnail_512x512.jpeg

VmhqBJAwrt44D9w5c6v6_17_d8e832f9a863b69ac192096223c6ae47_thumbnail_512x512.jpeg

283 ms

ftMS6B62NlQt1ZyAOZMY_01_9ea51551941cca6e24a9880fddac7b85_thumbnail_512x512.jpg

ftMS6B62NlQt1ZyAOZMY_01_9ea51551941cca6e24a9880fddac7b85_thumbnail_512x512.jpg

282 ms

Inter-Regular.woff

Inter-Regular.woff

262 ms

Inter-Semibold.woff

Inter-Semibold.woff

265 ms

Inter-Light.woff

Inter-Light.woff

625 ms

Inter-Bold.woff

Inter-Bold.woff

346 ms

Inter-Black.woff

Inter-Black.woff

351 ms

Accessibility Review

anonup.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

anonup.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

anonup.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Anonup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Anonup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

anonup.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Anon Up. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: