Tools & Wizards About Us
answerbag.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

answerbag.com

Answerbag -- Start a conversation. Have some fun.

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

308 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

319 ms

answerbag.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Answerbag content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about answerbag.com

Ask questions on any topic, get real answers from real people. Have a question? Ask it. Know an answer? Share it.

Visit answerbag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Answerbag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 308 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

answerbag.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,880 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.334

34/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

answerbag.com

308 ms

css

22 ms

jquery-ui.css

16 ms

bootstrap.min.css

67 ms

font-awesome.min.css

89 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Answerbag.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 6% (2 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (778 ms) belongs to the original domain Answerbag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 48.1 kB (28%)

Content Size

170.2 kB

After Optimization

122.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Answerbag.com main page is 170.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 89.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 39.4 kB

  • Original 46.3 kB
  • After minification 38.6 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 16.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 89.5 kB
  • After minification 87.1 kB
  • After compression 84.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 18.3 kB
  • After minification 18.3 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Answerbag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (60%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Answerbag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

answerbag.com

answerbag.com

308 ms

css

css

22 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

16 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

67 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

89 ms

main.css

main.css

91 ms

style.css

style.css

153 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

155 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

18 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

15 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

44 ms

main.js

main.js

150 ms

api.js

api.js

85 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

94 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

337 ms

ab_banner170x71.png

ab_banner170x71.png

778 ms

955ece3dabd49b2a27edae51a614fab9.jpg

955ece3dabd49b2a27edae51a614fab9.jpg

777 ms

placeholder.png

placeholder.png

432 ms

4f3800f9d95405868981c6f845962408.jpg

4f3800f9d95405868981c6f845962408.jpg

777 ms

33a2cf2457022d4c0510db6ea33b41ba.jpg

33a2cf2457022d4c0510db6ea33b41ba.jpg

777 ms

b90c922bbd3ed368743986af38dae8e9.png

b90c922bbd3ed368743986af38dae8e9.png

776 ms

596a6cfb13c515e8078b690d77dbbedb.jpg

596a6cfb13c515e8078b690d77dbbedb.jpg

777 ms

724c6dc6e65fc3e4f49b59e6260643e2.jpg

724c6dc6e65fc3e4f49b59e6260643e2.jpg

777 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

456 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

439 ms

ufonts.com_gotham_light-webfont.woff

ufonts.com_gotham_light-webfont.woff

324 ms

gotham-bold-webfont.woff

gotham-bold-webfont.woff

353 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMZhKg.ttf

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMZhKg.ttf

354 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

421 ms

ads

ads

431 ms

collect

collect

47 ms

ads

ads

443 ms

collect

collect

84 ms

js

js

84 ms

ads

ads

405 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

228 ms

Accessibility Review

answerbag.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

answerbag.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

answerbag.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Answerbag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Answerbag.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

answerbag.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Answerbag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: