2.5 sec in total
133 ms
1.9 sec
494 ms
Welcome to answeringservicecare.net homepage info - get ready to check Answering Servicecare best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about answeringservicecare.net
Never miss another call with our custom solutions. Join 4,000+ organizations who use our services to help their customers.
Visit answeringservicecare.netWe analyzed Answeringservicecare.net page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
answeringservicecare.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value3.0 s
77/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value3.5 s
92/100
10%
133 ms
92 ms
28 ms
31 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Answeringservicecare.net, 83% (63 requests) were made to 48p7mn3xc3d43f83kcxg13aq.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Static.olark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (332 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 782.6 kB (56%)
1.4 MB
622.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Answeringservicecare.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 586.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Answering Servicecare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 238.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 238.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 489.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Answeringservicecare.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 489.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (61%)
71
28
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Answering Servicecare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.answeringservicecare.net
133 ms
css
92 ms
bootstrap.css
28 ms
shortcodes.css
31 ms
bootstrap.min.css
31 ms
font-awesome.min.css
28 ms
style.css
30 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
31 ms
woocommerce.css
31 ms
bootstrap.min.css
33 ms
font-awesome.min.css
32 ms
style.css
35 ms
rpt_style.min.css
34 ms
jetpack.css
34 ms
jquery.js
38 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
37 ms
strap-extras.js
37 ms
bootstrap.js
37 ms
init.js
36 ms
responsive-modernizr.js
38 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
37 ms
bootstrap.js
38 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
39 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
38 ms
woocommerce.min.js
39 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
39 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
39 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
71 ms
responsive-scripts.js
40 ms
responsive-plugins.js
39 ms
bj-lazy-load.min.js
41 ms
wp-embed.min.js
40 ms
e-201609.js
20 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
49 ms
style.css
7 ms
analytics.js
306 ms
loader0.js
304 ms
bg.jpg
248 ms
asc-logo.png
248 ms
slide-2.jpg
253 ms
slide-3.jpg
255 ms
slide-1.jpg
259 ms
divide-lt.png
248 ms
icon-247.png
250 ms
icon-message-center.png
250 ms
icon-virtual-office.png
252 ms
icon-live-operators.png
255 ms
icon-fax-to-email.png
253 ms
icon-bilingual-services.png
256 ms
icon-voicemail.png
256 ms
icon-call-recording.png
259 ms
icon-local-number.png
259 ms
icon-toll-free.png
259 ms
icon-schedule.png
261 ms
icon-auto-attendant.png
259 ms
icon-disaster-recovery.png
261 ms
icon-virtual.png
265 ms
icon-overflow-services.png
265 ms
icon-personalized-greeting.png
263 ms
blue-seal-120-61-globalresponsecorporation-92003523.png
263 ms
atsi.jpg
265 ms
logos.jpg
266 ms
divide-dk.png
266 ms
7XUFZ5tgS-tD6QamInJTcU3KvHLhcNjEHFQzwNtdMQY.ttf
330 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wprzsSLeNQG2cy_mKit6iEdYs.ttf
332 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
263 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
264 ms
g.gif
33 ms
collect
18 ms
7323-391-10-1230.js
63 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
21 ms
facebook.jpg
3 ms
google.jpg
14 ms
twitter.jpg
14 ms
youtube.jpg
15 ms
application2.js
104 ms
answeringservicecare.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
answeringservicecare.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
answeringservicecare.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Answeringservicecare.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Answeringservicecare.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
answeringservicecare.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Answering Servicecare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: