2.5 sec in total
285 ms
2.1 sec
186 ms
Click here to check amazing Antidot content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about antidot.com
Antidot Internet Services. We Analyse, design, program, host and maintain websites, intranet, extranet and online apps based on open sources technologies.
Visit antidot.comWe analyzed Antidot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
antidot.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value13.3 s
0/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
285 ms
579 ms
160 ms
339 ms
512 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Antidot.com, 14% (6 requests) were made to Themes.googleusercontent.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Antidot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 863.1 kB (23%)
3.8 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Antidot.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 628.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Antidot needs image optimization as it can save up to 628.3 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 112.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 112.1 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Antidot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
32
32
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Antidot. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
antidot.com
285 ms
www.antidot.com
579 ms
app.css
160 ms
app.js
339 ms
24141.png
512 ms
24101.png
511 ms
24131.png
519 ms
9791.png
577 ms
9371.png
698 ms
9361.png
747 ms
9771.png
793 ms
9401.png
766 ms
9331.png
797 ms
9311.png
912 ms
9301.png
882 ms
9281.png
849 ms
9271.png
936 ms
9261.png
1053 ms
6201.png
983 ms
6001.png
947 ms
5981.png
983 ms
5951.png
1011 ms
5921.png
1029 ms
5891.png
1046 ms
5881.png
1088 ms
5851.png
1102 ms
5821.png
1120 ms
S400I105577.png
1133 ms
S800I106126.png
1150 ms
logo.png
971 ms
new_social_icones.png
1005 ms
bahamas-webfont.woff
896 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
25 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
30 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
84 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
89 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxn5HxGBcBvicCpTp6spHfNo.woff
90 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxjqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
90 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
bg-gallery.png
835 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
52 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
antidot.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
antidot.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
antidot.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Antidot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Antidot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
antidot.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Antidot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: