Tools & Wizards About Us
antifilter.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

antifilter.de

Der Domainname antifilter.de steht zum Verkauf.

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

246 ms

Resources Loaded

656 ms

Page Rendered

167 ms

antifilter.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to antifilter.de homepage info - get ready to check Antifilter best content right away, or after learning these important things about antifilter.de

Sichern Sie sich jetzt Ihre Wunschdomain! ✓ Sichere Zahlungsabwicklung ✓ Kompetentes Serviceteam ✓ Treuhändische Abwicklung

Visit antifilter.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Antifilter.de page load time and found that the first response time was 246 ms and then it took 823 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

antifilter.de performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.197

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

antifilter.de

246 ms

saledefault.css

7 ms

style.css

6 ms

zeropark.css

7 ms

css

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Antifilter.de, 43% (3 requests) were made to D38psrni17bvxu.cloudfront.net and 14% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (284 ms) relates to the external source C.parkingcrew.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.8 kB (50%)

Content Size

5.7 kB

After Optimization

2.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Antifilter.de main page is 5.7 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 2.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 57% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 563 B

  • Original 761 B
  • After minification 249 B
  • After compression 198 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 563 B or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 653 B

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Antifilter.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 653 B or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (60%)

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Antifilter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

antifilter.de

antifilter.de

246 ms

saledefault.css

saledefault.css

7 ms

style.css

style.css

6 ms

zeropark.css

zeropark.css

7 ms

css

css

18 ms

sale_form.js

sale_form.js

284 ms

lander

lander

141 ms

Accessibility Review

antifilter.de accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

antifilter.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

antifilter.de SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Antifilter.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Antifilter.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

antifilter.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Antifilter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: