Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

antisack.com

Home - Antisack

Page Load Speed

15.6 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

13 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

antisack.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Antisack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about antisack.com

Visit antisack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Antisack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 14.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

antisack.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,700 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

antisack.com

1470 ms

style.min.css

71 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

69 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

76 ms

js_composer.min.css

301 ms

Our browser made a total of 205 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (168 requests) were addressed to the original Antisack.com, 11% (22 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 1% (3 requests) were made to Client.crisp.chat. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Antisack.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 457.9 kB (9%)

Content Size

5.0 MB

After Optimization

4.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Antisack.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 167.2 kB

  • Original 196.9 kB
  • After minification 189.2 kB
  • After compression 29.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 167.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 259.5 kB

  • Original 3.7 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Antisack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 918.0 kB
  • After minification 918.0 kB
  • After compression 894.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 220.1 kB
  • After minification 219.9 kB
  • After compression 211.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Antisack.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 150 (74%)

Requests Now

204

After Optimization

54

The browser has sent 204 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Antisack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 70 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 82 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

antisack.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

antisack.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

antisack.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Antisack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Antisack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Antisack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: