Tools & Wizards About Us
antivia.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

antivia.com

Business Intelligence - insightsoftware

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

98 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

4.5 sec

antivia.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Antivia content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about antivia.com

Visit antivia.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Antivia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

antivia.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,690 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.068

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

antivia.com

98 ms

153 ms

106 ms

93281659a139de7a.js

53 ms

wp-rvp-public.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Antivia.com, 92% (71 requests) were made to Insightsoftware.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Client-registry.mutinycdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (575 ms) relates to the external source Insightsoftware.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 212.7 kB (2%)

Content Size

9.2 MB

After Optimization

9.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Antivia.com main page is 9.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 212.1 kB

  • Original 256.6 kB
  • After minification 256.6 kB
  • After compression 44.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 212.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 8.9 MB
  • After minification 8.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Antivia images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 122 B

  • Original 69.2 kB
  • After minification 69.2 kB
  • After compression 69.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 426 B

  • Original 33.6 kB
  • After minification 33.6 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Antivia.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (35%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

48

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Antivia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

antivia.com

antivia.com

98 ms

153 ms

106 ms

93281659a139de7a.js

93281659a139de7a.js

53 ms

wp-rvp-public.css

wp-rvp-public.css

39 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

66 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

65 ms

global.css

global.css

99 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

110 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

69 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

69 ms

block-header.css

block-header.css

218 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

90 ms

block-product-cards.css

block-product-cards.css

259 ms

block-content-block.css

block-content-block.css

211 ms

block-erp-slider.css

block-erp-slider.css

258 ms

block-accordion.css

block-accordion.css

211 ms

block-columned-row.css

block-columned-row.css

257 ms

block-tabbed-box.css

block-tabbed-box.css

290 ms

block-faqs.css

block-faqs.css

290 ms

forms.css

forms.css

303 ms

cookie.min.js

cookie.min.js

301 ms

datalayer.js

datalayer.js

280 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

79 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

305 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

333 ms

geoip2.js

geoip2.js

164 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

303 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

301 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

251 ms

css2

css2

243 ms

bg-pattern-purple.png

bg-pattern-purple.png

143 ms

insightsoftware-logo-new.svg

insightsoftware-logo-new.svg

190 ms

capterra-badge.svg

capterra-badge.svg

48 ms

get-app-badge.svg

get-app-badge.svg

39 ms

img_Business_Intelligence_hero.png

img_Business_Intelligence_hero.png

105 ms

img_xPA_for_Power_BI_card.png

img_xPA_for_Power_BI_card.png

74 ms

img_Financial_Reporting_for_Oracle_card.png

img_Financial_Reporting_for_Oracle_card.png

133 ms

img_Vizlib_card.png

img_Vizlib_card.png

85 ms

img_Power_On_card.png

img_Power_On_card.png

82 ms

img_Logi_Symphony_card.png

img_Logi_Symphony_card.png

72 ms

img_Simba_card.png

img_Simba_card.png

133 ms

img_Business_Intelligence_sol.png

img_Business_Intelligence_sol.png

138 ms

OpenAI.png

OpenAI.png

135 ms

Elastic.png

Elastic.png

143 ms

MongoDB.png

MongoDB.png

161 ms

SQL.png

SQL.png

186 ms

Oracle.png

Oracle.png

181 ms

Trino.png

Trino.png

194 ms

Redshift.png

Redshift.png

209 ms

Bigquery.png

Bigquery.png

201 ms

Powerbi.png

Powerbi.png

216 ms

Qlik.png

Qlik.png

263 ms

Sisense.png

Sisense.png

256 ms

Informatica.png

Informatica.png

365 ms

Talend.png

Talend.png

262 ms

Snowflake.png

Snowflake.png

274 ms

SAP.png

SAP.png

257 ms

Python.png

Python.png

299 ms

img_Business_Intelligence_use.png

img_Business_Intelligence_use.png

310 ms

img_role_Product_Manager.png

img_role_Product_Manager.png

333 ms

img_role_BI_Manager-2.png

img_role_BI_Manager-2.png

336 ms

img_role_App_Developer-1.png

img_role_App_Developer-1.png

380 ms

img_role_C_Suite-1-2.png

img_role_C_Suite-1-2.png

432 ms

ind_%E2%80%AFHealthcare-.png

ind_%E2%80%AFHealthcare-.png

428 ms

ind_fintech.png

ind_fintech.png

435 ms

img_industry_Manufacturing.png

img_industry_Manufacturing.png

523 ms

government.png

government.png

433 ms

ind_nonprofit-2.png

ind_nonprofit-2.png

431 ms

img_industry_retail.png

img_industry_retail.png

575 ms

img_industry_Oil_Energy.png

img_industry_Oil_Energy.png

527 ms

23-09-WBN-LeveragingLogiSymphony-Website-678x334.png

23-09-WBN-LeveragingLogiSymphony-Website-678x334.png

563 ms

23-08-WBN-SuperchargePowerBI-Website-678x334.png

23-08-WBN-SuperchargePowerBI-Website-678x334.png

564 ms

24-01-WBN-RevealingVizlibProductRoadmap-Website-678x334.png

24-01-WBN-RevealingVizlibProductRoadmap-Website-678x334.png

551 ms

cs_caolive.png

cs_caolive.png

563 ms

cs_siemens.png

cs_siemens.png

540 ms

cs_sisence-1.png

cs_sisence-1.png

537 ms

Accessibility Review

antivia.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

antivia.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

antivia.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Antivia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Antivia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

antivia.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Antivia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: