3.4 sec in total
341 ms
2.7 sec
424 ms
Click here to check amazing Antiville content for France. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about antiville.fr
Découvrez les entreprises près de chez. Des entreprises spécialisées en construction, rénovation et aménagement en Wallonie et à Bruxelles.
Visit antiville.frWe analyzed Antiville.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
antiville.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value15.7 s
0/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value3,200 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value17.8 s
4/100
10%
341 ms
264 ms
745 ms
111 ms
346 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Antiville.fr, 78% (61 requests) were made to Guideo.be and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Guideo.be.
Page size can be reduced by 171.9 kB (28%)
616.8 kB
444.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Antiville.fr main page is 616.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 311.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 170.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Antiville images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (90%)
68
7
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Antiville. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
antiville.fr
341 ms
rechercher-une-entreprise
264 ms
bJbM3pXkWzHArmJMOpT1sK32CX8.js
745 ms
style.min.css
111 ms
styles.css
346 ms
cf7msm.css
118 ms
pagenavi-css.css
352 ms
main.css
160 ms
style.css
210 ms
style.basic.css
227 ms
style-curvy-black.css
478 ms
jquery.min.js
316 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
239 ms
email-decode.min.js
205 ms
cookie-consent.js
306 ms
polyfill.min.js
390 ms
polyfill.min.js
829 ms
fontawesome.min.css
412 ms
system-fontawesome.min.css
421 ms
fontawesome-brands.min.css
490 ms
bootstrap-main.min.css
527 ms
main.min.css
850 ms
main.min.css
534 ms
main.min.css
596 ms
main.min.css
537 ms
style.css
542 ms
index.js
545 ms
index.js
639 ms
cf7msm.min.js
557 ms
js
77 ms
main.js
592 ms
asl-prereq.js
694 ms
asl-core.js
697 ms
asl-results-vertical.js
825 ms
asl-ga.js
825 ms
asl-load.js
825 ms
asl-wrapper.js
824 ms
wordpress-homepage.min.js
919 ms
api.js
42 ms
vedd3670a3b1c4e178fdfb0cc912d969e1713874337387
98 ms
frontend.min.js
917 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
851 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
884 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1093 ms
index.js
1046 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1017 ms
masonry.min.js
897 ms
popper.min.js
893 ms
bootstrap.min.js
822 ms
core.min.js
853 ms
view-masonry.min.js
851 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
847 ms
sweetalert2.all.min.js
839 ms
autosize.min.js
905 ms
jquery.coo_kie.min.js
792 ms
lazyload.min.js
898 ms
css;charset=utf-8;base64,Y2xvdWRmbGFyZS1hcHBbYXBwPSJwaW50ZXJlc3Qtc2F2ZS1idXR0b24iXSB7CiAgZGlzcGxheTogYmxvY2s7CiAgbWFyZ2luOiAxZW0gMDsKICBwb3NpdGlvbjogcmVsYXRpdmU7CiAgei1pbmRleDogMTsKfQo=
1 ms
gtm.js
216 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
635 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
539 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
634 ms
bullet.svg
522 ms
js
106 ms
matomo.js
902 ms
analytics.js
121 ms
api.min.js
91 ms
la-solid-900.woff
663 ms
la-regular-400.woff
296 ms
recaptcha__en.js
177 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
466 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
278 ms
collect
46 ms
pinit.js
124 ms
Guideo-lg-01.png.webp
320 ms
collect
120 ms
js
137 ms
ga-audiences
181 ms
pinit_main.js
15 ms
antiville.fr accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
antiville.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
antiville.fr SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Antiville.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Antiville.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
antiville.fr
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Antiville. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: