1.9 sec in total
193 ms
1.4 sec
346 ms
Visit apidaecare.com now to see the best up-to-date Apidaecare content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about apidaecare.com
Visit apidaecare.comWe analyzed Apidaecare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
apidaecare.com performance score
193 ms
88 ms
143 ms
128 ms
139 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Apidaecare.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (487 ms) relates to the external source D2k8q1rlvf5rbi.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 600.6 kB (54%)
1.1 MB
516.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Apidaecare.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 534.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Apidaecare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 366.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 366.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 186.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Apidaecare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 186.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (61%)
66
26
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Apidaecare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.apidaecare.com
193 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
88 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
143 ms
jquery-ui-spinner.css
128 ms
calendar-jos.css
139 ms
form_maker_frontend.css
137 ms
jquery-ui-aristo.min.css
138 ms
css
60 ms
genericons.css
164 ms
style.css
191 ms
active-styles.css
200 ms
jquery.js
276 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
201 ms
js
47 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js
193 ms
jelly.min.js
234 ms
file-upload.js
247 ms
calendar.js
254 ms
calendar_function.js
269 ms
style.css
266 ms
script.js
301 ms
widget.min.js
324 ms
core.min.js
313 ms
mouse.min.js
335 ms
slider.min.js
334 ms
button.min.js
335 ms
spinner.min.js
369 ms
effect.min.js
370 ms
effect-shake.min.js
380 ms
position.min.js
398 ms
menu.min.js
401 ms
autocomplete.min.js
406 ms
search-autocomplete.min.js
439 ms
masonry.min.js
430 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
436 ms
slider.js
466 ms
functions.js
470 ms
wp-embed.min.js
475 ms
style.css
320 ms
icon-12.png
487 ms
temp_homecare2-min.jpg
263 ms
Nurse-1-min.png
112 ms
attendents-icon-1-min.png
112 ms
doctors-medical-icon-1-min.png
112 ms
lab-diagnosis-1-min.png
112 ms
gree.jpg
261 ms
green.jpg
359 ms
80.jpg
309 ms
winter_tips.jpg
262 ms
gree.jpg
262 ms
green.jpg
327 ms
80.jpg
324 ms
winter_tips.jpg
326 ms
facebook.png
314 ms
twitter.png
367 ms
google_plus.png
372 ms
linkedin.png
390 ms
rss.png
391 ms
youtube.png
390 ms
gs_async.js
271 ms
css
44 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
102 ms
BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf
242 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
252 ms
5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf
267 ms
bullet.png
332 ms
arrows.png
328 ms
LgcV55siz7BRNdbO3Huj5g.ttf
179 ms
XNVd6tsqi9wmKNvnh5HNEKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
180 ms
AcvTq8Q0lyKKNxRlL28Rn6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
179 ms
VqvVqv1mv0Gr1Gr9Frul7xuyp+V8XvqnTyb1UoNRm4Af+FsAGNAEuwCFBYsQEBjlmxRgYrWCGwEFlLsBRSWCGwgFkdsAYrXFhZsBQrAAAAAVLP0T8AAA==
11 ms
pause.png
324 ms
analytics.js
125 ms
v1_gs_lib-e2a8bc3cf83db1d30114ab643a3fc178.js
22 ms
collect
11 ms
apidaecare.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Apidaecare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Apidaecare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
apidaecare.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Apidaecare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: