Tools & Wizards About Us
apollohomecare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

apollohomecare.com

Apollo HomeCare - #1 Home Care Services in India | Healthcare at Home

Page Load Speed

9.3 sec in total

First Response

576 ms

Resources Loaded

8.3 sec

Page Rendered

469 ms

apollohomecare.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Apollo Home Care content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about apollohomecare.com

Home Care Services - Apollo HomeCare aims to provide healthcare services of international standards in Hyderabad, Bangalore, Kolkata, Chennai, Delhi, and other cities. Our services include doctor home...

Visit apollohomecare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Apollohomecare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 576 ms and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

apollohomecare.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,130 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.6 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

apollohomecare.com

576 ms

apollohomecare.com

1607 ms

gtm.js

56 ms

lite-yt-embed.css

483 ms

admin.css

726 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (98 requests) were addressed to the original Apollohomecare.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Apollohomecare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 207.9 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Apollohomecare.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 151.7 kB

  • Original 185.5 kB
  • After minification 169.3 kB
  • After compression 33.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Apollo Home Care images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 337.2 kB
  • After minification 337.2 kB
  • After compression 323.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 23.3 kB

  • Original 139.1 kB
  • After minification 139.1 kB
  • After compression 115.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Apollohomecare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (63%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

33

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Apollo Home Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

apollohomecare.com

apollohomecare.com

576 ms

apollohomecare.com

apollohomecare.com

1607 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

56 ms

lite-yt-embed.css

lite-yt-embed.css

483 ms

admin.css

admin.css

726 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

731 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

728 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

733 ms

bootstrap-front.css

bootstrap-front.css

743 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

830 ms

style.css

style.css

1459 ms

dflip.min.css

dflip.min.css

971 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

973 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1225 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

993 ms

function.js

function.js

1083 ms

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

1216 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

1217 ms

selectnav.min.js

selectnav.min.js

1243 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

1104 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

1291 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

1290 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

1291 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

1291 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

1377 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

1467 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

1474 ms

intlTelInput.min.css

intlTelInput.min.css

1475 ms

spf_style.css

spf_style.css

1484 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1510 ms

accordion-custom.js

accordion-custom.js

1617 ms

accordion.js

accordion.js

1710 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

1719 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1719 ms

jquery.webui-popover.min.js

jquery.webui-popover.min.js

1728 ms

match-height.js

match-height.js

1761 ms

scrollto.min.js

scrollto.min.js

1873 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

1963 ms

flexslider.min.js

flexslider.min.js

1964 ms

slidebars.min.js

slidebars.min.js

1720 ms

fitvid.js

fitvid.js

1491 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1521 ms

a11y-accordion.js

a11y-accordion.js

1636 ms

accessible-tabs.js

accessible-tabs.js

1710 ms

main.js

main.js

1701 ms

dflip.min.js

dflip.min.js

1740 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

1529 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1631 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1612 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

1479 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1477 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1533 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

1633 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

1596 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

1412 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

1417 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

1425 ms

intlTelInput-jquery.min.js

intlTelInput-jquery.min.js

1487 ms

utils.js

utils.js

1869 ms

spf_main.js

spf_main.js

1559 ms

lite-yt-embed.js

lite-yt-embed.js

1469 ms

lato-v17-latin-regular.woff

lato-v17-latin-regular.woff

1782 ms

lato-v17-latin-700.woff

lato-v17-latin-700.woff

2033 ms

apollo.woff

apollo.woff

1611 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1687 ms

Apollo-Banner-Apr-25-1-1920x500-1-1.jpg

Apollo-Banner-Apr-25-1-1920x500-1-1.jpg

1812 ms

healthcare.jpg

healthcare.jpg

1816 ms

physiotheraphy.jpg

physiotheraphy.jpg

1944 ms

Apollo-Banner-June-14-1920x500-1.jpg

Apollo-Banner-June-14-1920x500-1.jpg

2181 ms

Apollo-Banner-Apr-25-3-1920x500-2.jpg

Apollo-Banner-Apr-25-3-1920x500-2.jpg

1766 ms

eldership.jpg

eldership.jpg

2142 ms

1a.jpg

1a.jpg

1866 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

1796 ms

Image-4.jpg

Image-4.jpg

1815 ms

Image-3-1.jpg

Image-3-1.jpg

1947 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

2010 ms

Image-2-1.jpg

Image-2-1.jpg

1993 ms

4.png

4.png

1898 ms

3.png

3.png

1960 ms

5.png

5.png

1959 ms

Vector-Smart-Object-2.png

Vector-Smart-Object-2.png

1959 ms

1.png

1.png

1965 ms

Apollo-Thumbnail-May-24.jpg

Apollo-Thumbnail-May-24.jpg

2835 ms

Vector-Smart-Object-2-1.png

Vector-Smart-Object-2-1.png

1821 ms

Vector-Smart-Object-3.png

Vector-Smart-Object-3.png

1943 ms

Vector-Smart-Object-4.png

Vector-Smart-Object-4.png

1934 ms

Vector-Smart-Object-3-1.png

Vector-Smart-Object-3-1.png

1945 ms

Vector-Smart-Object-1-1.png

Vector-Smart-Object-1-1.png

1960 ms

Vector-Smart-Object-5.png

Vector-Smart-Object-5.png

1890 ms

mobile.png

mobile.png

1945 ms

google-play.png

google-play.png

1938 ms

apply.png

apply.png

1962 ms

banner_jan20-copy-3.png

banner_jan20-copy-3.png

2251 ms

app-section.jpg

app-section.jpg

2012 ms

down-arrow.png

down-arrow.png

1679 ms

lato-v17-latin-regular.ttf

lato-v17-latin-regular.ttf

1914 ms

lato-v17-latin-700.ttf

lato-v17-latin-700.ttf

1934 ms

lato-v17-latin-regular.svg

lato-v17-latin-regular.svg

537 ms

lato-v17-latin-700.svg

lato-v17-latin-700.svg

544 ms

Accessibility Review

apollohomecare.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

apollohomecare.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

apollohomecare.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Apollohomecare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Apollohomecare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

apollohomecare.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Apollo Home Care. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: