4.1 sec in total
1 sec
2.8 sec
306 ms
Click here to check amazing Appeal content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about appeal.pro
Chad’s success can be attributed to the fact that he has limited his practice to handling appeals and trial court motions likely to be at issue on appeal. After receiving degrees from U.T. and S.M.U.,...
Visit appeal.proWe analyzed Appeal.pro page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
appeal.pro performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.3 s
98/100
10%
Value1.5 s
100/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value1,350 ms
17/100
30%
Value2.868
0/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
1001 ms
108 ms
123 ms
31 ms
221 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Appeal.pro, 11% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Appeal.pro.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (66%)
2.4 MB
798.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Appeal.pro main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 98.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Appeal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 857.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 857.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 602.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Appeal.pro needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 602.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (85%)
52
8
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Appeal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
appeal.pro
1001 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
108 ms
layerslider.css
123 ms
css
31 ms
settings.css
221 ms
font-awesome.min.css
140 ms
ionicons.min.css
155 ms
nanoscroller.css
150 ms
mobinav.css
163 ms
style.css
182 ms
font-awesome.css
206 ms
animations.css
245 ms
media.css
237 ms
greensock.js
297 ms
jquery.js
303 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
272 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
460 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
314 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
407 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
408 ms
likesScript.js
349 ms
themwitch.js
379 ms
css
22 ms
css
28 ms
css
31 ms
ninja-forms-display.css
354 ms
qtip.css
394 ms
jquery.rating.css
406 ms
overthrow.min.js
444 ms
jquery.nanoscroller.min.js
477 ms
mobi.nav.js
442 ms
comment-reply.min.js
466 ms
modernizr-min.js
469 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js
632 ms
jquery.cycle.js
585 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js
541 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
540 ms
jquery.fitvids-min.js
526 ms
main.js
986 ms
wp-embed.min.js
596 ms
jquery.form.min.js
611 ms
underscore.min.js
534 ms
backbone.min.js
569 ms
ninja-forms-display.min.js
575 ms
style.css
678 ms
ga.js
7 ms
analytics.js
101 ms
newlogoV1.png
101 ms
__utm.gif
87 ms
logoRetina740.png
339 ms
home-300x273.jpg
339 ms
combined1102v200.png
521 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
49 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
48 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
49 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
50 ms
QQt14e8dY39u-eYBZmppwTqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
49 ms
icomoon.woff
250 ms
collect
16 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
226 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
264 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
6 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxjqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
7 ms
ionicons.ttf
406 ms
appeal.pro accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
appeal.pro best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
appeal.pro SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Appeal.pro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Appeal.pro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
appeal.pro
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Appeal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: