Tools & Wizards About Us
appetals.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

appetals.com

Hire Top Tech Talent in India - Appetals Solutions

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

627 ms

appetals.com screenshot

About Website

Visit appetals.com now to see the best up-to-date Appetals content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about appetals.com

Looking to hire top tech talent in India? Our decades of expertise and AI tool help you find the perfect tech talent for your organization.

Visit appetals.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Appetals.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

appetals.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.appetals.com

1253 ms

hotjar-135085.js

137 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

218 ms

material.min.js

121 ms

bootstrap-material-design.css

121 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Appetals.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Appetals.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 864.9 kB (18%)

Content Size

4.8 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Appetals.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 118.7 kB

  • Original 142.1 kB
  • After minification 132.5 kB
  • After compression 23.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 130.2 kB

  • Original 3.7 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Appetals images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 607.2 kB

  • Original 899.2 kB
  • After minification 898.5 kB
  • After compression 292.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 607.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 11.1 kB
  • After minification 9.8 kB
  • After compression 2.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Appetals.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (30%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

46

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Appetals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.appetals.com

www.appetals.com

1253 ms

hotjar-135085.js

hotjar-135085.js

137 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

218 ms

material.min.js

material.min.js

121 ms

bootstrap-material-design.css

bootstrap-material-design.css

121 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

113 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

128 ms

491 ms

css

css

25 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

263 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

194 ms

477 ms

js

js

29 ms

377 ms

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

35 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

13 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

56 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

collect

collect

50 ms

css

css

55 ms

logo-black-big.png

logo-black-big.png

231 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

233 ms

banner-22.jpg

banner-22.jpg

234 ms

banner-32.jpg

banner-32.jpg

230 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

228 ms

interndesk.png

interndesk.png

233 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

230 ms

1pxwhitline.png

1pxwhitline.png

231 ms

fabyuth.png

fabyuth.png

235 ms

warrantyist.png

warrantyist.png

244 ms

web-dev-bg1.png

web-dev-bg1.png

258 ms

right11.png

right11.png

234 ms

mobile-app-bg.jpg

mobile-app-bg.jpg

236 ms

onsite-bg.jpg

onsite-bg.jpg

245 ms

digital-bg.jpg

digital-bg.jpg

235 ms

idea-to-product-bg.jpg

idea-to-product-bg.jpg

243 ms

enterprise-bg1.jpg

enterprise-bg1.jpg

269 ms

web-dev-bg.png

web-dev-bg.png

324 ms

right-arrow.png

right-arrow.png

254 ms

productfabyouth.jpg

productfabyouth.jpg

261 ms

shachisood.png

shachisood.png

600 ms

maharaja.png

maharaja.png

527 ms

vestune.png

vestune.png

404 ms

dna-ican.png

dna-ican.png

418 ms

contact-us-btn.png

contact-us-btn.png

313 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

241 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

236 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

272 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

262 ms

00e7fd0d-ce40-4d76-b3ee-ce5d409a5270.jpg

00e7fd0d-ce40-4d76-b3ee-ce5d409a5270.jpg

299 ms

contact-bg.jpg

contact-bg.jpg

300 ms

PROXIMA_NOVA_BLACK.ttf

PROXIMA_NOVA_BLACK.ttf

365 ms

QUESTRIAL-REGULAR.otf

QUESTRIAL-REGULAR.otf

294 ms

PROXIMA_NOVA_SEMIBOLD.ttf

PROXIMA_NOVA_SEMIBOLD.ttf

361 ms

PROXIMA_NOVA_BOLD.ttf

PROXIMA_NOVA_BOLD.ttf

364 ms

PROXIMA_NOVA_LIGHT.ttf

PROXIMA_NOVA_LIGHT.ttf

363 ms

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

364 ms

PROXIMA_NOVA_EXTRABOLD.ttf

PROXIMA_NOVA_EXTRABOLD.ttf

364 ms

visit-data

visit-data

214 ms

coloredbg.png

coloredbg.png

114 ms

featured-down-arrow1.png

featured-down-arrow1.png

114 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

45 ms

common.js

common.js

72 ms

map.js

map.js

73 ms

util.js

util.js

70 ms

marker.js

marker.js

69 ms

onion.js

onion.js

47 ms

openhand_8_8.cur

openhand_8_8.cur

33 ms

Accessibility Review

appetals.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

appetals.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

appetals.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Appetals.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Appetals.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

appetals.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Appetals. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: