Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

appeteyes.me

Appeteyes Appetite Driven AR menu on Instagram Snapchat Facebook & via browser

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

4.3 sec

appeteyes.me screenshot

About Website

Welcome to appeteyes.me homepage info - get ready to check Appeteyes best content right away, or after learning these important things about appeteyes.me

Appetite Driven Augmented Reality Platform that enchances your restaurant menu with the rising popularity of 3D content. Scanning and Development services

Visit appeteyes.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Appeteyes.me page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

appeteyes.me performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10,070 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.272

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.3 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

appeteyes.me

59 ms

appeteyes.me

76 ms

font-awesome.min.css

96 ms

360v.css

49 ms

addition.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Appeteyes.me, 3% (3 requests) were made to Js.stripe.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (880 ms) relates to the external source Analytics-api.statvoo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.6 kB (1%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Appeteyes.me main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 21.4 kB

  • Original 30.6 kB
  • After minification 30.5 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Appeteyes images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 26.4 kB
  • After minification 26.4 kB
  • After compression 26.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 25.7 kB
  • After minification 25.7 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Appeteyes.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (12%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

89

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Appeteyes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

appeteyes.me accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

appeteyes.me best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

appeteyes.me SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Appeteyes.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Appeteyes.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Appeteyes. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: