8.2 sec in total
514 ms
6.7 sec
961 ms
Welcome to appetite.me.uk homepage info - get ready to check Appetite best content right away, or after learning these important things about appetite.me.uk
Discover Appetite Me: experts in rural diversification, retail and hospitality. Creating award-winning farm shops, cafes and retail villages.
Visit appetite.me.ukWe analyzed Appetite.me.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 514 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
appetite.me.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value16.4 s
0/100
10%
Value590 ms
51/100
30%
Value2.065
0/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
514 ms
82 ms
163 ms
227 ms
229 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Appetite.me.uk, 17% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (601 ms) belongs to the original domain Appetite.me.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 475.1 kB (37%)
1.3 MB
797.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Appetite.me.uk main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 642.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 276.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 276.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 145.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Appetite needs image optimization as it can save up to 145.9 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 43.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Appetite.me.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (60%)
53
21
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Appetite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.appetite.me.uk
514 ms
cleantalk-public.min.css
82 ms
light-box-styles.css
163 ms
swiper.min.css
227 ms
core.min.css
229 ms
slick.min.css
238 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
240 ms
style.min.css
241 ms
style.min.css
238 ms
css
54 ms
twentytwenty.css
299 ms
bafg-style.css
300 ms
jquery.min.js
396 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
315 ms
apbct-public-bundle.min.js
320 ms
ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js
30 ms
tracker.js
322 ms
jquery.event.move.js
374 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
375 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
530 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
530 ms
swiper.min.js
533 ms
slick.min.js
530 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
531 ms
scripts.min.js
566 ms
hashchange.js
531 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
531 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
532 ms
common.js
533 ms
bafg-custom-js.js
570 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
569 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
580 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
601 ms
Logo-primary-header.png
153 ms
preloader.gif
185 ms
proj-dev-3.png
203 ms
creative-1.png
203 ms
vis-merch-1.png
205 ms
buying.png
223 ms
interior-1.png
224 ms
14294.jpg
266 ms
CLA.jpg
364 ms
First-Franchise.jpg
285 ms
Bidwells.jpg
287 ms
Savills.jpg
371 ms
Carter-Jonas.jpg
298 ms
Brown-Co.jpg
345 ms
Ceres.jpg
365 ms
FRA.jpg
562 ms
malcolm-scott-scaled.jpg
563 ms
bayley-sage-scaled.jpg
562 ms
Pale-Green-Appetite-Me-Logo-2002.png
562 ms
et-divi-dynamic-9-late.css
366 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
21 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
36 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
47 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
50 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
52 ms
modules.ttf
482 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
50 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKd3vXDXbtY.ttf
52 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKebunDXbtY.ttf
47 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf
49 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfFunDXbtY.ttf
51 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsunDXbtY.ttf
52 ms
style.min.css
183 ms
appetite.me.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
appetite.me.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
appetite.me.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Appetite.me.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Appetite.me.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
appetite.me.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Appetite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: