Tools & Wizards About Us
applicationletter.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

applicationletter.in

Application Letter - Get All Type of Application Letter Samples

Page Load Speed

16.7 sec in total

First Response

7.2 sec

Resources Loaded

9.2 sec

Page Rendered

317 ms

applicationletter.in screenshot

About Website

Visit applicationletter.in now to see the best up-to-date Application Letter content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about applicationletter.in

Here you will get all types of application letter samples. like school, college, office, marriage, bank, leave, related application letter.

Visit applicationletter.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Applicationletter.in page load time and found that the first response time was 7.2 sec and then it took 9.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

applicationletter.in performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,110 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.165

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

applicationletter.in

7180 ms

gppstub.js

71 ms

bootstrap.min.css

419 ms

style.min.css

609 ms

screen.min.css

414 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Applicationletter.in, 34% (18 requests) were made to Go.ezodn.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to The.gatekeeperconsent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Applicationletter.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 135.6 kB (25%)

Content Size

535.3 kB

After Optimization

399.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Applicationletter.in main page is 535.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 278.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 135.0 kB

  • Original 188.6 kB
  • After minification 188.6 kB
  • After compression 53.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 135.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 88 B

  • Original 278.4 kB
  • After minification 278.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Application Letter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 511 B

  • Original 68.2 kB
  • After minification 68.2 kB
  • After compression 67.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (72%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Application Letter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

applicationletter.in

applicationletter.in

7180 ms

gppstub.js

gppstub.js

71 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

419 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

609 ms

screen.min.css

screen.min.css

414 ms

style.css

style.css

437 ms

css

css

54 ms

icons.min.css

icons.min.css

414 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

772 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

424 ms

js

js

82 ms

ezvideojscss.css

ezvideojscss.css

132 ms

ezvideojspluginscss.css

ezvideojspluginscss.css

154 ms

ezvideocss.css

ezvideocss.css

162 ms

ccpaplus.js

ccpaplus.js

80 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

854 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

857 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

438 ms

main.js

main.js

862 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

450 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

464 ms

boise.js

boise.js

92 ms

abilene.js

abilene.js

96 ms

et.js

et.js

110 ms

mulvane.js

mulvane.js

34 ms

wichita.js

wichita.js

93 ms

raleigh.js

raleigh.js

35 ms

vista.js

vista.js

36 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

301 ms

v.js

v.js

124 ms

olathe.js

olathe.js

33 ms

axolotl.js

axolotl.js

82 ms

Application-For-Discharge-Certificate-690x391.jpeg

Application-For-Discharge-Certificate-690x391.jpeg

759 ms

Full-Fee-Concession-Application-690x391.jpeg

Full-Fee-Concession-Application-690x391.jpeg

583 ms

Loan-Closure-Letter-Format-690x391.jpg

Loan-Closure-Letter-Format-690x391.jpg

796 ms

Resignation-Letter-In-Kannada-690x391.jpg

Resignation-Letter-In-Kannada-690x391.jpg

794 ms

Complaint-Letter-To-Police-For-Threatening-690x391.jpg

Complaint-Letter-To-Police-For-Threatening-690x391.jpg

585 ms

Complaint-Letter-For-Electricity-Meter-690x391.jpg

Complaint-Letter-For-Electricity-Meter-690x391.jpg

602 ms

Application-For-Name-Change-In-School-690x391.jpg

Application-For-Name-Change-In-School-690x391.jpg

1377 ms

Request-Letter-For-Bonafide-Certificate-From-School-690x391.jpg

Request-Letter-For-Bonafide-Certificate-From-School-690x391.jpg

1169 ms

Application-For-Degree-Certificate-690x391.jpg

Application-For-Degree-Certificate-690x391.jpg

1184 ms

Letter-Writing-In-Kannada-690x391.jpg

Letter-Writing-In-Kannada-690x391.jpg

1340 ms

ezoic.png

ezoic.png

66 ms

js

js

58 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

31 ms

va9E4kDNxMZdWfMOD5Vfkw.woff

va9E4kDNxMZdWfMOD5Vfkw.woff

80 ms

font

font

82 ms

tortoise.js

tortoise.js

49 ms

vitals.js

vitals.js

78 ms

drake.js

drake.js

48 ms

chanute.js

chanute.js

47 ms

jellyfish.js

jellyfish.js

47 ms

collect

collect

35 ms

Accessibility Review

applicationletter.in accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

applicationletter.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

applicationletter.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Applicationletter.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Applicationletter.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

applicationletter.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Application Letter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: