Tools & Wizards About Us
applicazioni.it screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

applicazioni.it

Applicazioni IT - Applicazioni utili. Scarica app Android e iOs

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

145 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

410 ms

applicazioni.it screenshot

About Website

Visit applicazioni.it now to see the best up-to-date Applicazioni content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about applicazioni.it

Scopri le migliori applicazioni per smartphone e tablet. Leggi le recensioni delle app per Android e iOs, con i link diretti per scaricarle dagli store.

Visit applicazioni.it

Key Findings

We analyzed Applicazioni.it page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

applicazioni.it performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,090 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.251

49/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

applicazioni.it

145 ms

www.applicazioni.it

389 ms

autoptimize_d76a3a00f738ed1043c1089a164d082f.css

61 ms

adsbygoogle.js

164 ms

jquery.js

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Applicazioni.it, 12% (6 requests) were made to Google.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (442 ms) relates to the external source Uxwing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 416.2 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Applicazioni.it main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 949.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 76.7 kB

  • Original 95.4 kB
  • After minification 95.4 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 88.1 kB

  • Original 802.6 kB
  • After minification 714.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Applicazioni needs image optimization as it can save up to 88.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 215.4 kB

  • Original 949.6 kB
  • After minification 949.3 kB
  • After compression 734.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 215.4 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 36.0 kB

  • Original 58.6 kB
  • After minification 46.0 kB
  • After compression 22.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Applicazioni.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 62% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (63%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Applicazioni. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

applicazioni.it

applicazioni.it

145 ms

www.applicazioni.it

www.applicazioni.it

389 ms

autoptimize_d76a3a00f738ed1043c1089a164d082f.css

autoptimize_d76a3a00f738ed1043c1089a164d082f.css

61 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

164 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

82 ms

autoptimize_single_80529ec8dbf91e771ccca3646fe9300b.js

autoptimize_single_80529ec8dbf91e771ccca3646fe9300b.js

51 ms

css

css

51 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

37 ms

cse.js

cse.js

64 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

24 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

51 ms

api.js

api.js

129 ms

OneSignalSDK.js

OneSignalSDK.js

53 ms

js

js

135 ms

autoptimize_c0ee0eeb7ae7732c8b6b350119f74159.js

autoptimize_c0ee0eeb7ae7732c8b6b350119f74159.js

38 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

122 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

154 ms

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

184 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

121 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

153 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

190 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

337 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

343 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

342 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf

342 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

115 ms

cse_element__en.js

cse_element__en.js

150 ms

default+en.css

default+en.css

182 ms

default.css

default.css

180 ms

instagram-square.png

instagram-square.png

442 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

294 ms

facebook.svg

facebook.svg

222 ms

feed.svg

feed.svg

221 ms

applicazioni-logo.png

applicazioni-logo.png

221 ms

preview-app-come-funziona-600x400.jpg

preview-app-come-funziona-600x400.jpg

221 ms

find-my-kids-app-per-famiglie-600x400.jpg

find-my-kids-app-per-famiglie-600x400.jpg

222 ms

uno-2-600x400.png

uno-2-600x400.png

223 ms

uno-600x400.png

uno-600x400.png

348 ms

Immagine2-600x400.png

Immagine2-600x400.png

349 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

283 ms

async-ads.js

async-ads.js

107 ms

branding.png

branding.png

81 ms

clear.png

clear.png

55 ms

js

js

175 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

169 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

189 ms

ads

ads

166 ms

collect

collect

62 ms

ca-pub-3282700642913089

ca-pub-3282700642913089

94 ms

Accessibility Review

applicazioni.it accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

applicazioni.it best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

applicazioni.it SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Applicazioni.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Applicazioni.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

applicazioni.it

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Applicazioni. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: