4.1 sec in total
563 ms
3 sec
511 ms
Visit applover.com now to see the best up-to-date Applover content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about applover.com
We are Applover, one of FT 1000: Europe’s Fastest Growing Companies. We create beautiful custom software products with a complex approach.
Visit applover.comWe analyzed Applover.com page load time and found that the first response time was 563 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
applover.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.2 s
0/100
10%
Value16.3 s
0/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value2,130 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.163
72/100
15%
Value16.8 s
5/100
10%
563 ms
671 ms
222 ms
334 ms
361 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Applover.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (936 ms) relates to the external source Api.startservicefounds.com.
Page size can be reduced by 217.0 kB (39%)
551.3 kB
334.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Applover.com main page is 551.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 258.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 181.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 181.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Applover images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 22.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Applover.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (76%)
51
12
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Applover. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
applover.com
563 ms
applover.com
671 ms
76c5390c9a8cbd6edfe458ba07863f22.css
222 ms
6ee9848081be6bca8b6b007108d7f17b.css
334 ms
a31cfa0bc4b6c6a4ed7daddb1840e6b5.css
361 ms
94ea9cf7012372e2be9c1023c4184a2a.css
361 ms
7a83f94f75b6011dcca4c057639e0dda.css
628 ms
6d3dcaf2bf9188d1717a1d996a1d8e08.js
558 ms
js
52 ms
03bac5898fea658e40b07444faec706a.js
371 ms
jquery.min.js
494 ms
ac9be9c37a1b62ebd3bb7082e105fa1e.js
668 ms
8359531.js
65 ms
f27318f7892ffa3cf2717a46db77cc73.js
491 ms
a12924bdbbee6a6a2147c0378000f3e2.js
863 ms
252a650470c7853276ab871d1ad46ee5.js
666 ms
8359531.js
65 ms
sort.js
936 ms
fbevents.js
150 ms
gtm.js
104 ms
hotjar-2161990.js
224 ms
bg-squares.svg
159 ms
arrow-right.svg
161 ms
bg-squares-white.svg
162 ms
analytics.js
157 ms
js
97 ms
8359531.js
319 ms
fb.js
157 ms
collectedforms.js
175 ms
conversations-embed.js
175 ms
banner.js
319 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
316 ms
insight.min.js
289 ms
uwt.js
275 ms
lftracker_v1_lYNOR8xMxZg7WQJZ.js
595 ms
modules.a4fd7e5489291affcf56.js
196 ms
collect
180 ms
collect
190 ms
flag-ue.png
261 ms
logo-hero-clutch.svg
267 ms
star.svg
268 ms
ISO_black.svg
755 ms
PoF.svg
272 ms
Airly.svg
349 ms
collect
39 ms
adsct
154 ms
adsct
152 ms
collect
25 ms
ga-audiences
30 ms
ga-audiences
47 ms
tr-rc.lfeeder.com
65 ms
config.js
40 ms
cc.js
9 ms
applover.com accessibility score
applover.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
applover.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Applover.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Applover.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
applover.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Applover. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: