Tools & Wizards About Us
appmechanic.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

appmechanic.in

Best in Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Standalone PC Software

Page Load Speed

7.4 sec in total

First Response

488 ms

Resources Loaded

6.6 sec

Page Rendered

292 ms

appmechanic.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to appmechanic.in homepage info - get ready to check Appmechanic best content right away, or after learning these important things about appmechanic.in

We provide a wide range of mobile apps and pc standalone software development services including Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality apps.

Visit appmechanic.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Appmechanic.in page load time and found that the first response time was 488 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

appmechanic.in performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.4 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.209

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

appmechanic.in

488 ms

www.appmechanic.in

1518 ms

bootstrap.min.css

478 ms

style.min.css

929 ms

swiper.min.css

703 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Appmechanic.in, 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Appmechanic.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 81.5 kB (14%)

Content Size

580.6 kB

After Optimization

499.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Appmechanic.in main page is 580.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 182.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 77.3 kB

  • Original 96.1 kB
  • After minification 93.7 kB
  • After compression 18.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 148.6 kB
  • After minification 147.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Appmechanic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 792 B

  • Original 182.3 kB
  • After minification 182.3 kB
  • After compression 181.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 153.6 kB
  • After minification 152.7 kB
  • After compression 151.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Appmechanic.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (84%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Appmechanic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

appmechanic.in

appmechanic.in

488 ms

www.appmechanic.in

www.appmechanic.in

1518 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

478 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

929 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

703 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

704 ms

deprecated-style.min.css

deprecated-style.min.css

716 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

725 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

980 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

39 ms

public.css

public.css

938 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

947 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

959 ms

style.css

style.css

968 ms

style.css

style.css

1163 ms

hero-slider.min.css

hero-slider.min.css

1176 ms

elementor.min.css

elementor.min.css

1183 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

1201 ms

wpzoom-socicon.css

wpzoom-socicon.css

980 ms

wpzoom-social-icons-styles.css

wpzoom-social-icons-styles.css

992 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

1167 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1417 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1187 ms

post-3141.css

post-3141.css

1383 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1224 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

1240 ms

post-2604.css

post-2604.css

1585 ms

css

css

34 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1426 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1468 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1492 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1652 ms

js

js

64 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

1665 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1779 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

1785 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

1889 ms

functions.min.js

functions.min.js

1896 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1955 ms

hero-slider.js

hero-slider.js

1987 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

2080 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

1888 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

1665 ms

social-icons-widget-frontend.js

social-icons-widget-frontend.js

1733 ms

sp-scripts.min.js

sp-scripts.min.js

1756 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

2100 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1623 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1668 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1657 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1721 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1752 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1810 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1677 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1667 ms

LogoAM.png

LogoAM.png

1004 ms

ARbannerpic.png

ARbannerpic.png

1533 ms

Unity3DLogo.png

Unity3DLogo.png

1106 ms

UnrealEngineLogo.png

UnrealEngineLogo.png

1157 ms

ARButton.png

ARButton.png

1158 ms

VirtualRealityImage.png

VirtualRealityImage.png

1161 ms

font

font

26 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1624 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1243 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

3 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

15 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1554 ms

Accessibility Review

appmechanic.in accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

appmechanic.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

appmechanic.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Appmechanic.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Appmechanic.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

appmechanic.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Appmechanic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: