7.8 sec in total
603 ms
6.8 sec
446 ms
Click here to check amazing Appsted content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about appsted.com
Appsted is a top mobile app development company in USA that offers app development services for iOS, Android, React Native and Flutter.
Visit appsted.comWe analyzed Appsted.com page load time and found that the first response time was 603 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
appsted.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value3.3 s
91/100
10%
Value1,010 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value6.3 s
61/100
10%
603 ms
1127 ms
493 ms
750 ms
502 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Appsted.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Images.dmca.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Appsted.com.
Page size can be reduced by 432.1 kB (46%)
936.6 kB
504.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Appsted.com main page is 936.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 408.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Appsted images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 279.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 279.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Appsted.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (51%)
53
26
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Appsted. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
appsted.com
603 ms
www.appsted.com
1127 ms
reset.css
493 ms
style.css
750 ms
layerSlider.css
502 ms
html5shiv.js
500 ms
jquery.js
1281 ms
jquery-ui.js
1363 ms
layerslider.js
984 ms
responsive.css
757 ms
overalljs.js
513 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
skype.png
257 ms
live-chat.png
252 ms
logo.png
264 ms
wallpaper.jpg
2026 ms
google-like-button
261 ms
dmca_protected_sml_120n.png
84 ms
tweet-like-button.png
525 ms
fb-like-button.png
529 ms
icon-slider.png
491 ms
tabico1.png
256 ms
arwdwn.png
481 ms
tabico2.png
1028 ms
tabico3.png
509 ms
tabico4.png
763 ms
bullet.png
729 ms
b1.png
979 ms
b2.png
770 ms
b3.png
977 ms
b4.png
1018 ms
b5.png
1033 ms
b6.png
1226 ms
b7.png
1224 ms
b8.png
1271 ms
gray-patch.png
1530 ms
fi6.png
1293 ms
tbv.png
1468 ms
fi8.png
1473 ms
fi1.png
1525 ms
tbh.png
1556 ms
fi4.png
1712 ms
fi5.png
1721 ms
fi2.png
1779 ms
facebook-foot.png
1781 ms
tweet-foot.png
1818 ms
protected.png
1958 ms
footer-logo.png
1969 ms
breuertext-regular-webfont.woff
2291 ms
breuertext-medium-webfont.woff
2286 ms
breuertext-bold-webfont.woff
2343 ms
skin.css
2159 ms
collect
26 ms
tab2.png
2290 ms
google-like-button
2293 ms
tweet-like-button.png
2092 ms
fb-like-button.png
2233 ms
www.appsted.com
571 ms
www.appsted.com
550 ms
www.appsted.com
782 ms
www.appsted.com
793 ms
appsted.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
appsted.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
appsted.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Appsted.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Appsted.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
appsted.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Appsted. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: