Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

aptrack.co

idibu: Job Distribution that Works Seamlessly with your CRM

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

192 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

aptrack.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Aptrack content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about aptrack.co

Best-in-class integrations with the top recruitment CRMs. Attract and engage candidates effortlessly, measure job advert performance within your CRM.

Visit aptrack.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Aptrack.co page load time and found that the first response time was 192 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aptrack.co performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.8 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,920 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.188

65/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

uk.idibu.com

192 ms

uk.idibu.com

1078 ms

jquery-1.11.2.js

159 ms

module_47523933255_Loader_Module.min.css

137 ms

module_45865957515_Logo_Carousel_New.min.css

336 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Aptrack.co, 5% (5 requests) were made to No-cache.hubspot.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Cdn2.hubspot.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Uk.idibu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 647.4 kB (11%)

Content Size

6.1 MB

After Optimization

5.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Aptrack.co main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 164.5 kB

  • Original 184.9 kB
  • After minification 169.0 kB
  • After compression 20.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 453.1 kB

  • Original 5.7 MB
  • After minification 5.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aptrack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 136.9 kB
  • After minification 136.9 kB
  • After compression 126.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 19.5 kB

  • Original 89.7 kB
  • After minification 89.7 kB
  • After compression 70.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aptrack.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (63%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aptrack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

aptrack.co accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

aptrack.co best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

aptrack.co SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aptrack.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aptrack.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Aptrack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: