Tools & Wizards About Us
aquaprofil.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

aquaprofil.ru

Инженерная сантехника. Интернет магазин сантехники АкваПрофиль

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

704 ms

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

354 ms

aquaprofil.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Aquaprofil content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about aquaprofil.ru

Надёжная инженерная сантехника! Производство гибкой подводки АКВАПРОФ. Сантехника оптом и розничный интернет магазин сантехники в Москве.

Visit aquaprofil.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Aquaprofil.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 704 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aquaprofil.ru performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value290 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aquaprofil.ru

704 ms

highslide.min.css

148 ms

highslide.packed.js

344 ms

flowplayer-3.2.9.min.js

342 ms

calendar.css

356 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Aquaprofil.ru, 9% (5 requests) were made to Cp.onicon.ru and 5% (3 requests) were made to Counter.megagroup.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Aquaprofil.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 177.1 kB (34%)

Content Size

520.6 kB

After Optimization

343.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Aquaprofil.ru main page is 520.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 261.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 23.6 kB

  • Original 33.0 kB
  • After minification 30.3 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 261.4 kB
  • After minification 258.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aquaprofil images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 111.6 kB

  • Original 179.5 kB
  • After minification 170.2 kB
  • After compression 67.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 111.6 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 39.2 kB

  • Original 46.9 kB
  • After minification 40.0 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aquaprofil.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (69%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aquaprofil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

aquaprofil.ru

aquaprofil.ru

704 ms

highslide.min.css

highslide.min.css

148 ms

highslide.packed.js

highslide.packed.js

344 ms

flowplayer-3.2.9.min.js

flowplayer-3.2.9.min.js

342 ms

calendar.css

calendar.css

356 ms

ru.js

ru.js

356 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

355 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

374 ms

calendar.packed.js

calendar.packed.js

522 ms

feedback.factory.min.js

feedback.factory.min.js

521 ms

no_cookies.js

no_cookies.js

527 ms

shop_pack_4.js

shop_pack_4.js

526 ms

jquery-1.6.1.min.js

jquery-1.6.1.min.js

706 ms

popupmenu.menu.jquery.js

popupmenu.menu.jquery.js

541 ms

shop_easing.js

shop_easing.js

685 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

686 ms

styles.css

styles.css

692 ms

styles_shop.css

styles_shop.css

697 ms

watch.js

watch.js

1 ms

top_bg.jpg

top_bg.jpg

150 ms

top_pic.jpg

top_pic.jpg

2276 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

171 ms

cart.gif

cart.gif

173 ms

tmn_bg.gif

tmn_bg.gif

168 ms

tmn_l.gif

tmn_l.gif

172 ms

tmn_r.gif

tmn_r.gif

299 ms

lmn_bg.gif

lmn_bg.gif

326 ms

lmn_t.gif

lmn_t.gif

328 ms

lmn_b.gif

lmn_b.gif

328 ms

lmn_line.gif

lmn_line.gif

325 ms

lmn_i.gif

lmn_i.gif

501 ms

kat_t.gif

kat_t.gif

514 ms

kat_line.gif

kat_line.gif

510 ms

%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%B7_%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BA%D0%B0-%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BA%D0%B0.jpg

%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%B7_%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BA%D0%B0-%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BA%D0%B0.jpg

512 ms

logo_EMS.png

logo_EMS.png

512 ms

98555203_5.jpg

98555203_5.jpg

657 ms

zoomin.cur

zoomin.cur

686 ms

97177003_5.jpg

97177003_5.jpg

684 ms

1709866_5.jpg

1709866_5.jpg

682 ms

212164203_5.jpg

212164203_5.jpg

685 ms

146935003_5.jpg

146935003_5.jpg

816 ms

bot_bg.jpg

bot_bg.jpg

856 ms

bot_l.jpg

bot_l.jpg

1021 ms

mega.gif

mega.gif

856 ms

counter.php

counter.php

295 ms

hit

hit

311 ms

simple_loader.js

simple_loader.js

720 ms

loader.js

loader.js

288 ms

api.js

api.js

176 ms

hit

hit

177 ms

782346421e606327271d25533a27e3d4.js

782346421e606327271d25533a27e3d4.js

141 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

279 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

156 ms

onicon.site.min.css

onicon.site.min.css

872 ms

onicon.site.min.js

onicon.site.min.js

1886 ms

Accessibility Review

aquaprofil.ru accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

aquaprofil.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

aquaprofil.ru SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aquaprofil.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Aquaprofil.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

aquaprofil.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Aquaprofil. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: