3.1 sec in total
314 ms
2.2 sec
628 ms
Welcome to ar-racking.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check AR Racking best content right away, or after learning these important things about ar-racking.co.uk
At AR Racking we design, manufacture and install storage systems for all types of loads for customers in the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Visit ar-racking.co.ukWe analyzed Ar-racking.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 314 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ar-racking.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value12.1 s
4/100
10%
Value1,670 ms
11/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.8 s
4/100
10%
314 ms
668 ms
66 ms
106 ms
210 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ar-racking.co.uk, 96% (46 requests) were made to Ar-racking.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (881 ms) relates to the external source Ar-racking.com.
Page size can be reduced by 344.7 kB (42%)
829.7 kB
485.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Ar-racking.co.uk main page is 829.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 454.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 226.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 226.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. AR Racking images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 85.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (93%)
46
3
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AR Racking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ar-racking.co.uk
314 ms
668 ms
gtm.js
66 ms
ae7f421e8e2f3bc7.css
106 ms
f90ad86030d3409a.css
210 ms
72daa1695f95bf70.css
301 ms
839dee60abc6d4ce.css
316 ms
751ee914e8ea85d6.css
321 ms
be4e82fe7e8238b2.css
334 ms
e1c48793575a0438.css
345 ms
1d6fc16f9729b1ef.css
402 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
449 ms
1653.34fe07095074b1d0.js
429 ms
958.efb618eb93542e2f.js
429 ms
2886.15f68b72d306e7cb.js
445 ms
6193.9bcb3b251e939e8b.js
462 ms
2482.150f1b94a996f5cc.js
501 ms
3134.a4ed5a847ec51b56.js
535 ms
7090.31c83067740a659d.js
536 ms
9309.8458080d8c480480.js
557 ms
4153.cb36a7880d72fdc9.js
552 ms
8682.0d146582e104ef6b.js
571 ms
6310.94b9806806c9fd53.js
601 ms
184.9c5db82a49e443b9.js
641 ms
29107295-4a69275373f23f88.js
749 ms
9703.d45f541e419af349.js
656 ms
8285.7600696224001b4f.js
667 ms
2004.e6cac41a62f8ca0c.js
684 ms
6344.c7ad8ff5e8ac766d.js
700 ms
314.1a3812c03d0382ca.js
746 ms
75fc9c18-55217e80064ded2b.js
759 ms
4386.0a3106a4f6781935.js
778 ms
246.af629413da04fffc.js
796 ms
1775.cf8fa9921861fe92.js
799 ms
8325.c912578c7a3464d3.js
851 ms
9557.12e9dfc7e429b0db.js
855 ms
1156.09b77e0cfc9498aa.js
863 ms
9447.5de85ec55f814c40.js
881 ms
webpack-7bd29894aa40c881.js
808 ms
framework-79bce4a3a540b080.js
794 ms
main-5b0262a55968cef9.js
768 ms
_app-ac8f08a8a3654548.js
866 ms
3769-1b7df30b7f4fc350.js
653 ms
8871-75a88a07beec57f6.js
795 ms
index-1275ebd4bb6ea4e0.js
694 ms
_buildManifest.js
746 ms
_ssgManifest.js
678 ms
minimal-down.svg
713 ms
ar-racking.co.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ar-racking.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ar-racking.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
GB
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ar-racking.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ar-racking.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ar-racking.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: