Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

arccjournals.com

Agricultural Research Communication Centre | ARCC Journals | Since 1967

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

88 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

799 ms

arccjournals.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to arccjournals.com homepage info - get ready to check ARCC Journals best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about arccjournals.com

Agricultural Research Communication Centre Journals are one of the best online open access journal site in the field of publishing research articles in Agricultural, animal, dairy, food, home, legume ...

Visit arccjournals.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Arccjournals.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arccjournals.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.274

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

arccjournals.com

88 ms

arccjournals.com

424 ms

bcbc7eef4d5b7ac5.css

45 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

110 ms

9703-994ea24742c89df6.js

100 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Arccjournals.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (424 ms) belongs to the original domain Arccjournals.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 61.6 kB (79%)

Content Size

77.7 kB

After Optimization

16.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Arccjournals.com main page is 77.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 72.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 59.2 kB

  • Original 72.1 kB
  • After minification 71.9 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 5.5 kB
  • After minification 3.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ARCC Journals needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (93%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ARCC Journals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

arccjournals.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

arccjournals.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

arccjournals.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arccjournals.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Arccjournals.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ARCC Journals. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: