5.7 sec in total
869 ms
3.5 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Archdesk content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about archdesk.com
Track your performance on dashboards, create reports and build processes. From finance management to estimating and scheduling.
Visit archdesk.comWe analyzed Archdesk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 869 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
archdesk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value2.8 s
82/100
25%
Value3.5 s
89/100
10%
Value140 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.06
98/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
869 ms
301 ms
220 ms
217 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Archdesk.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Archdesk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 689.6 kB (16%)
4.3 MB
3.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Archdesk.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 337.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 337.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 333.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Archdesk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Archdesk.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (62%)
79
30
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Archdesk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
archdesk.com
869 ms
style.min.css
301 ms
slick.min.css
220 ms
blocks.style.build.css
217 ms
styles.css
27 ms
easy-author-image.css
23 ms
styles.css
30 ms
slick.css
42 ms
wpls-public.css
49 ms
trp-language-switcher.css
53 ms
style.css
72 ms
bootstrap.min.css
64 ms
front_page.css
269 ms
style.css
78 ms
base.css
92 ms
layout.css
105 ms
shortcodes.css
117 ms
slick.css
127 ms
slick-theme.css
136 ms
animations.min.css
145 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
162 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
175 ms
responsive.css
191 ms
slick.min.js
205 ms
305890bf9e47.google-fonts.css
375 ms
style.css
206 ms
Archdesk-Logo.svg
25 ms
Archdesk-Logo-Mobile.svg
329 ms
email-decode.min.js
21 ms
index.js
323 ms
index.js
323 ms
front-page-scripts.js
324 ms
scripts.js
323 ms
slick.min.js
451 ms
core.min.js
429 ms
mouse.min.js
425 ms
sortable.min.js
430 ms
tabs.min.js
480 ms
accordion.min.js
485 ms
plugins.js
852 ms
menu.js
619 ms
animations.min.js
629 ms
jplayer.min.js
641 ms
translate3d.js
668 ms
scripts.js
786 ms
lazyload.min.js
805 ms
scripts.js
851 ms
74a56c082d42.google-fonts.css
832 ms
city-background.png
659 ms
wave.svg
769 ms
primary-link-arrow.svg
791 ms
white-link-arrow.svg
811 ms
mfn-icons.woff
887 ms
home-image-1.png
237 ms
mitie-logo-2.png
266 ms
maclennan.png
374 ms
wolffkran.png
395 ms
conditioned.png
413 ms
vinci-3.png
439 ms
halliday-lighting.png
466 ms
essentials-new.png
562 ms
archdesk-essentials-black-color.svg
601 ms
overview.svg
604 ms
arrow-right.svg
499 ms
pricing.svg
547 ms
demos.svg
655 ms
professional-new.png
866 ms
archdesk-professional-black-color.svg
750 ms
enterprise-new.png
766 ms
archdesk-enterprise-black-color.svg
800 ms
infographic.png
1086 ms
infographic-mobile.png
1166 ms
industries-archdesk.png
1520 ms
slide2_mini.jpg
967 ms
slide4_mini.jpg
1281 ms
slide1_mini.jpg
1412 ms
slide3_mini.jpg
1452 ms
feature-960x750.webp
1287 ms
Article-Thumbnails-42-960x750.png
1362 ms
Article-Thumbnails-41-960x750.png
1770 ms
main.js
9 ms
archdesk.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
archdesk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
archdesk.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Archdesk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Archdesk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
archdesk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Archdesk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: