12 sec in total
3 sec
8.4 sec
649 ms
Click here to check amazing Archimedia Web content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about archimediaweb.it
Archimedia è il partner tecnologico di riferimento per realtà di primaria importanza sul mercato nazionale.
Visit archimediaweb.itWe analyzed Archimediaweb.it page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
archimediaweb.it performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.9 s
0/100
10%
Value13.7 s
0/100
25%
Value25.3 s
0/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.444
21/100
15%
Value15.8 s
6/100
10%
2965 ms
397 ms
508 ms
343 ms
297 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Archimediaweb.it, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Archimediaweb.it.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (36%)
3.9 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Archimediaweb.it main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 366.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Archimedia Web needs image optimization as it can save up to 366.8 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 562.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 562.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 381.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Archimediaweb.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 381.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (54%)
48
22
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Archimedia Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
archimediaweb.it
2965 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
397 ms
js_composer_front.css
508 ms
styles.css
343 ms
rgs.css
297 ms
font-awesome.min.css
522 ms
style.css
1275 ms
responsive.css
951 ms
jquery.js
1028 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
785 ms
modernizr.js
813 ms
localStorage.js
491 ms
core.min.js
554 ms
widget.min.js
580 ms
position.min.js
687 ms
menu.min.js
703 ms
autocomplete.min.js
834 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
900 ms
jquery.form.min.js
903 ms
scripts.js
2071 ms
superfish.js
2072 ms
respond.js
2072 ms
sticky.js
2073 ms
prettyPhoto.js
2074 ms
isotope.min.js
2073 ms
init.js
2410 ms
js_composer_front.js
2074 ms
css
47 ms
css
48 ms
logo.png
1250 ms
logo2.png
1243 ms
map.jpg
1190 ms
Livello-231.png
4597 ms
home_tv.png
1487 ms
home_mobile.png
1185 ms
home_services_mobile_icon.png
1180 ms
home_services_widget_icon.png
1181 ms
home_services_testing_icon.png
1183 ms
home_services_web_icon.png
1265 ms
home_services_support_icon.png
1372 ms
home_services_hardware_icon.png
1380 ms
nav_button_active.png
1702 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
1128 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
1131 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
1130 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
1129 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
1130 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
2308 ms
ajax-loader.gif
363 ms
facebook-footer.png
574 ms
linkedin-footer.png
618 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
589 ms
ajax-loader.gif
366 ms
pipe.png
295 ms
facebook.png
383 ms
linkedin.png
352 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
634 ms
archimediaweb.it accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
archimediaweb.it best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
archimediaweb.it SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Archimediaweb.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Archimediaweb.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
archimediaweb.it
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Archimedia Web. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: