Tools & Wizards About Us
architecturefeed.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

architecturefeed.com

云顶yd2223线路检测(中国)有限公司-搜狗百科

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

architecturefeed.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to architecturefeed.com homepage info - get ready to check Architecturefeed best content right away, or after learning these important things about architecturefeed.com

云顶yd2223线路检测是一个世界领先的线上娱乐品牌,官方权威认证、支持手机版app网页客户端下载安装、最新信誉品牌网站,欢迎登陆官网入口体验!

Visit architecturefeed.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Architecturefeed.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

architecturefeed.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.architecturefeed.com

1185 ms

37a3a45da34d26cbf62a9013f2621e39.css

116 ms

style.min.css

175 ms

styles.css

117 ms

all.css

179 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Architecturefeed.com, 3% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Architecturefeed.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (47%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Architecturefeed.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 85.4 kB

  • Original 97.8 kB
  • After minification 77.1 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.7 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 857.4 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 897.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Architecturefeed needs image optimization as it can save up to 857.4 kB or 49% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 35.5 kB

  • Original 179.1 kB
  • After minification 178.2 kB
  • After compression 143.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 41.7 kB

  • Original 120.1 kB
  • After minification 117.2 kB
  • After compression 78.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Architecturefeed.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.7 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (63%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Architecturefeed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.architecturefeed.com

www.architecturefeed.com

1185 ms

37a3a45da34d26cbf62a9013f2621e39.css

37a3a45da34d26cbf62a9013f2621e39.css

116 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

175 ms

styles.css

styles.css

117 ms

all.css

all.css

179 ms

dark.css

dark.css

118 ms

default.css

default.css

121 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

243 ms

style.css

style.css

238 ms

swiper-bundle.css

swiper-bundle.css

181 ms

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.css

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.css

182 ms

animate.css

animate.css

233 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

294 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

236 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

255 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

354 ms

swiper-bundle.js

swiper-bundle.js

414 ms

hc-sticky.js

hc-sticky.js

307 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

305 ms

jquery.smartmenus.js

jquery.smartmenus.js

306 ms

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.js

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.js

352 ms

index.js

index.js

303 ms

index.js

index.js

310 ms

dark.js

dark.js

312 ms

custom.js

custom.js

361 ms

head-back.jpg

head-back.jpg

210 ms

5ae32161f5f2de491ef06a7da444620c.png

5ae32161f5f2de491ef06a7da444620c.png

498 ms

f8a7bc163f7e2a8d4683bf9397fdfe5f.png

f8a7bc163f7e2a8d4683bf9397fdfe5f.png

500 ms

a2a0994ae533394693d83e368cbca870.png

a2a0994ae533394693d83e368cbca870.png

504 ms

b313c84f22cb9a910416facd28baae73.png

b313c84f22cb9a910416facd28baae73.png

563 ms

27a41bc8737004d3040caf849f4d9e12.png

27a41bc8737004d3040caf849f4d9e12.png

457 ms

5ad34af269fad4994b18b7de010b764f.png

5ad34af269fad4994b18b7de010b764f.png

457 ms

171107763414d19a.jpg

171107763414d19a.jpg

575 ms

%E5%9B%BE%E7%89%872.jpg

%E5%9B%BE%E7%89%872.jpg

577 ms

%E7%A1%85%E9%85%B8%E9%92%A0%E7%B2%89%E6%9C%AB2.jpg

%E7%A1%85%E9%85%B8%E9%92%A0%E7%B2%89%E6%9C%AB2.jpg

556 ms

thyristor-modules4-300x214.jpg

thyristor-modules4-300x214.jpg

559 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

232 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

59 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

118 ms

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

0 ms

Accessibility Review

architecturefeed.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

architecturefeed.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

architecturefeed.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Architecturefeed.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Architecturefeed.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

architecturefeed.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Architecturefeed. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: