12.5 sec in total
377 ms
6.3 sec
5.8 sec
Visit architektenmonitor.de now to see the best up-to-date Architektenmonitor content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about architektenmonitor.de
Unsere Testsieger 2022 Nanoversiegelung Glasversiegelung sind Cleanglas, Nanolex, Preimess, von uns selbst getestet und für gut befunden.
Visit architektenmonitor.deWe analyzed Architektenmonitor.de page load time and found that the first response time was 377 ms and then it took 12.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
architektenmonitor.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value2,220 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.261
47/100
15%
Value18.4 s
3/100
10%
377 ms
940 ms
339 ms
442 ms
442 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Architektenmonitor.de, 72% (64 requests) were made to Nanoversiegelung-service.de and 8% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) relates to the external source Nanoversiegelung-service.de.
Page size can be reduced by 503.1 kB (11%)
4.7 MB
4.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Architektenmonitor.de main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 92.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Architektenmonitor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 44.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 318.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Architektenmonitor.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 318.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (70%)
82
25
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Architektenmonitor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
architektenmonitor.de
377 ms
14--testsieger-nano-glasversiegelung-
940 ms
global.css
339 ms
highdpi.css
442 ms
responsive-tables.css
442 ms
uniform.default.css
530 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
528 ms
cms.css
522 ms
blockcart.css
526 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
543 ms
blockcategories.css
547 ms
blockcurrencies.css
633 ms
blocklanguages.css
630 ms
blocknewsletter.css
635 ms
blocksearch.css
632 ms
jquery.autocomplete.css
650 ms
blocktags.css
642 ms
blocktopmenu.css
726 ms
superfish-modified.css
728 ms
blockviewed.css
725 ms
hooks.css
725 ms
theme6.css
745 ms
font7.css
749 ms
blockwishlist.css
831 ms
productcomments.css
831 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
945 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
834 ms
jquery.easing.js
848 ms
tools.js
847 ms
global.js
931 ms
10-bootstrap.min.js
1006 ms
15-jquery.total-storage.min.js
929 ms
15-jquery.uniform-modified.js
1037 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1046 ms
products-comparison.js
1064 ms
cms.js
1061 ms
ajax-cart.js
1062 ms
css
54 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
1021 ms
jquery.serialScroll.js
717 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
693 ms
treeManagement.js
767 ms
blocknewsletter.js
682 ms
jquery.autocomplete.js
681 ms
blocksearch.js
681 ms
hoverIntent.js
695 ms
superfish-modified.js
684 ms
blocktopmenu.js
775 ms
ajax-wishlist.js
689 ms
GoogleAnalyticActionLib.js
689 ms
css
16 ms
analytics.js
446 ms
nanoversiegelung%20Dusche%20praxis%20test.jpg
3648 ms
YTtCANsFvZI
483 ms
5_NWdXpoPOQ
581 ms
61HLNqQRepL._SX425_.jpg
420 ms
nanoversiegelung-service-logo-1456318362.jpg
403 ms
Cleanglas_Nanoversiegelung_Glasversiegelung_Dusche_Testsieger_2020_60KS.jpg
2518 ms
Amazon.png
403 ms
nanolex%20ultra.jpg
810 ms
footer-bg.png
387 ms
Platz1_CleanglaS_Glasversiegelung_Nanoversiegelung_Dusche_Vergleichstest_2022.jpg
2705 ms
zumhersteller.png
1382 ms
ebay.png
2371 ms
Platz2_Glasversiegelung_Nanoversiegelung_Vergleichstest_2022.jpg
2703 ms
Platz3_Glasversiegelung_Nanoversiegelung_Vergleichstest_2022.jpg
2700 ms
achtung_produkte_nanoversiegelung_fake_bewertung_amazon_carron_ixtral_biohy_innovano_glasversiegelung-2022.jpg
2700 ms
abacus_gekaufte-bewertung-amazon-2022_.jpg
2918 ms
Abacus%20Fakespot%20Analyse%20gekaufte%20Bewertung%20amazon2.jpg
3179 ms
cleanglas_echte-bewertung_2022_platz1_testsieger-nanoversiegelung.jpg
2919 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
440 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
85 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
85 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7wnU6AFw.woff
89 ms
ec.js
26 ms
collect
40 ms
collect
346 ms
www-player.css
162 ms
www-embed-player.js
152 ms
base.js
376 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
122 ms
ad_status.js
952 ms
9NsBbvP-L1Df-yHWGvBJgb6S-WRP1KsOTV1Pj0Mxhgc.js
694 ms
embed.js
347 ms
gJfj2lBrymlHLmhPScFZFm4D3a7BBd9OMx4--DsdpK8.js
508 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff
231 ms
id
23 ms
Create
206 ms
Create
418 ms
architektenmonitor.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
architektenmonitor.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
architektenmonitor.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Architektenmonitor.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Architektenmonitor.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
architektenmonitor.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Architektenmonitor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: