10.5 sec in total
542 ms
9.3 sec
640 ms
Visit archive.ru now to see the best up-to-date Archive content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about archive.ru
Корпорация ЭЛАР — крупнейшее в Европе специализированное предприятие по созданию, комплексному оснащению и наполнению электронных архивов, внедрению передовой техники, информационных технологий и реше...
Visit archive.ruWe analyzed Archive.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 542 ms and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
archive.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.0 s
0/100
10%
Value26.1 s
0/100
25%
Value27.4 s
0/100
10%
Value340 ms
74/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value30.1 s
0/100
10%
542 ms
510 ms
1311 ms
42 ms
381 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Archive.ru, 74% (51 requests) were made to Elar.ru and 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.7 sec) relates to the external source Elar.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (46%)
3.8 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Archive.ru main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.4 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 186.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Archive needs image optimization as it can save up to 186.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 410.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Archive.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 410.9 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (52%)
58
28
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Archive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
archive.ru
542 ms
www.elar.ru
510 ms
elar.ru
1311 ms
css2
42 ms
style.css
381 ms
style.css
519 ms
style.css
526 ms
style.css
392 ms
style.css
522 ms
style.css
529 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
1007 ms
vendor.css
1277 ms
banners.css
896 ms
custom.css
898 ms
styles.css
2828 ms
core.js
3639 ms
protobuf.js
2954 ms
model.js
1777 ms
rest.client.js
1509 ms
pull.client.js
2274 ms
jquery-2.1.0.min.js
2516 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
2410 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.min.js
2654 ms
script.js
2795 ms
vendor.js
4668 ms
dotdotdot.js
3042 ms
styles.js
3176 ms
common.js
3205 ms
index.js
3330 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
3875 ms
api.js
37 ms
tag.js
957 ms
sprite-s6db927f065.png
701 ms
main-page-bg.png
3046 ms
header-logo.svg
854 ms
header-logo-circle.svg
1080 ms
city.png
2039 ms
digital.png
2105 ms
izo.png
2214 ms
IZO-ishod.png
1912 ms
scroll-down.svg
2189 ms
zmqwfh7q5rxp2r6aqx6924cnllm8awhr.JPG
2847 ms
elarscan-home-b.png
3184 ms
elarscan.png
2864 ms
elarscan-home-b-title.png
2701 ms
dy5f3xv9mkgznts2m24gm8u378ywklll.jpg
2849 ms
teidztb3g1qg2ris3r1mvw5yaa3b442w.jpg
3464 ms
817zrpbebtfqfa01ohtfm6j13tsura6z.jpg
3860 ms
banner-xl.png
3610 ms
services-tech.jpg
3493 ms
services-serv.jpg
3805 ms
r9xxj4kxvfpc537gkyxp522uam2t4ke5.jpg
3946 ms
p90d4ga1ydx0j2z3r113qqcmfucxs485.jpg
4103 ms
87vd5j9aqmr9l3xafqcfexx89pit65xu.jpg
4042 ms
elar-logo.png
3988 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyovBJ.ttf
20 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsovBJ.ttf
35 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpfBJ.ttf
46 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
51 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf
51 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf
50 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
68 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
31 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
129 ms
ba.js
273 ms
recaptcha__en.js
29 ms
advert.gif
177 ms
bx_stat
181 ms
1
138 ms
archive.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
archive.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
archive.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Archive.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Archive.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
archive.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Archive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: