4.8 sec in total
896 ms
3.6 sec
286 ms
Visit argument-sb.ru now to see the best up-to-date Argument Sb content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about argument-sb.ru
Закажите систему видеонаблюдения в нашей компании. Цены низкие, поставляем оборудование по Москве и области
Visit argument-sb.ruWe analyzed Argument-sb.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 896 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
argument-sb.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value6.2 s
12/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value1,230 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.445
21/100
15%
Value10.3 s
25/100
10%
896 ms
289 ms
334 ms
336 ms
334 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Argument-sb.ru, 5% (3 requests) were made to Counter.megagroup.ru and 3% (2 requests) were made to Vk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (932 ms) belongs to the original domain Argument-sb.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 280.2 kB (42%)
663.0 kB
382.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Argument-sb.ru main page is 663.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 278.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 196.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.5 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 196.7 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Argument Sb images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 47.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.4 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Argument-sb.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (71%)
48
14
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Argument Sb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
argument-sb.ru
896 ms
jquery.min.js
289 ms
waslidemenu.css
334 ms
styles_articles_tpl.css
336 ms
lightgallery.proxy.to.hs.min.css
334 ms
lightgallery.proxy.to.hs.stub.min.js
342 ms
lightgallery.proxy.to.hs.js
338 ms
ru.js
432 ms
common.min.js
442 ms
calendar.css
443 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.css
452 ms
theme.less.css
612 ms
printme.js
543 ms
tpl.js
552 ms
baron.min.js
552 ms
shop2.2.js
700 ms
theme.scss.css
751 ms
site_addons.scss.css
654 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
776 ms
snow.js
135 ms
share42.js
557 ms
site.min.js
629 ms
defender.min.js
748 ms
lazyload.min.js
748 ms
s3.eventable.js
751 ms
s3.math.js
751 ms
s3.menu.allin.js
761 ms
lightgallery.min.css
775 ms
lightgallery.min.js
793 ms
lg-zoom.min.js
824 ms
s3.form.js
856 ms
plugins_js.js
932 ms
main.js
906 ms
412845_0543.webp
289 ms
spacer.gif
295 ms
op1.jpg
345 ms
op2.jpg
371 ms
image004.jpg
408 ms
image005.jpg
429 ms
image006.jpg
421 ms
warning-icon.png
377 ms
exo_2-r.woff
330 ms
exo_2-m.woff
391 ms
exo_2-l.woff
406 ms
exo_2-s-b.woff
423 ms
exo_2-b.woff
454 ms
hit
675 ms
watch.js
0 ms
counter
638 ms
loader.js
564 ms
share_count
497 ms
count.json
5 ms
share.php
229 ms
icons.png
232 ms
share.php
518 ms
dk
686 ms
api.js
110 ms
7e48fdcff7b01ca3153e6243654e3b13.js
110 ms
argument-sb.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
argument-sb.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
argument-sb.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
RU
![]()
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Argument-sb.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Argument-sb.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
argument-sb.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Argument Sb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: